Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

343
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
343
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.3K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.2K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

16.7K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
16.7K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.1K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

63.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
63.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reckoning with the ways in which the mechanistic worldview is embedded in chemicals management and how Indigenous Knowledge Systems might help account for the complexities of chemical risk.

Environment and planning. E, Nature and space·2026
Same author

A Dynamic Collapse Concept for Climate Change.

Environmental values·2026
Same author

Tracing Environmental Equity and Air Pollution Research at <i>ES&T</i>.

Environmental science & technology·2026
Same author

Impact of residential cooking and heating on temporal changes of black carbon in rural India.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Following the smell: terpene emission profiles through the cannabis life-cycle.

Environmental science. Processes & impacts·2025
Same author

How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.

PLOS global public health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.3K

Exploring Scientists' Values by Analyzing How They Frame Nature and Uncertainty.

Marco Vazquez1, Bronwyn McIlroy-Young1, Daniel Steel1

  • 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|February 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Scientific values influence environmental debates. Scientists’ views on nature and risk, revealed in publications, shape their stance on a wastewater treatment plant, even in technical controversies.

Keywords:
Cultural theory of riskframinguncertaintyvalues in sciencewastewater

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.3K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Science and Technology Studies
  • Environmental Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Scientific controversies surrounding complex environmental issues are often prolonged, with embedded values potentially playing a key role.
  • A wastewater treatment plant debate in British Columbia, Canada, was framed technically, yet involved scientists with opposing public stances.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the connection between scientists' positions in an environmental controversy and their portrayal of nature and risks in publications.
  • To explore how underlying values influence scientific perspectives in seemingly technical debates.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative content analysis of peer-reviewed publications.
  • Analysis focused on scientists with publicly opposing views on a wastewater treatment plant.
  • Examined the framing of nature and environmental risks within their scientific work.

Main Results:

  • Scientists opposing the treatment plant framed nature as tolerant of disturbances and risks, viewing science as a tool to reduce uncertainty.
  • Scientists favoring the treatment plant depicted nature as fragile, especially concerning human-induced risks, and highlighted the worrisome nature of scientific uncertainty.
  • Divergent portrayals of nature and risk were linked to scientists' stances on the wastewater treatment plant.

Conclusions:

  • Value-laden perspectives significantly impact scientists' positions, even in controversies presented as purely technical.
  • The study highlights how underlying beliefs about nature and uncertainty can shape scientific engagement in environmental policy debates.
  • Understanding these embedded values is crucial for resolving complex environmental controversies.