Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

828
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
828
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

137
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
137
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

196
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
196
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

12.9K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.9K
Role-Based Identity01:21

Role-Based Identity

80
Role-based identities are central to understanding how individuals navigate social environments by adopting distinct self-conceptions aligned with various societal roles. These identities are not fixed traits but are constructed through personal actions and the social feedback individuals receive in context-specific interactions. Each social role, such as student, teacher, or friend, carries a set of expectations and norms that influence how people think, feel, and behave within that...
80
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.4K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tuning into Experience: Self-Location Flexibility and Experiential Ability.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same author

Trait mindfulness is negatively related to physical health symptoms over time.

Psychology & health·2026
Same author

Where is the self? Relations between head-heart dualism and social judgment.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

In the Beast Mode: Predator Self-Identifications as a Model of Disagreeable Functioning.

Assessment·2026
Same author

Shedding light on public perceptions of scientists who engage in wrongness admission amidst a failed replication.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2025
Same author

Portraits in Misery: A Bottom-Up-to-Prototype Approach to Personality Assessment.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K

Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures.

Adam K Fetterman1, Michael D Robinson2, Brian P Meier3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX77204-5022akfetterman@uh.edu;  https://fettermanlab.weebly.com/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individual differences are crucial for testing scientific theories but are often overlooked. This commentary highlights their importance and applies this perspective to existing research mechanisms.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.7K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 17, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.7K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • The target article's goals and execution are commendable.
  • However, it largely overlooks the significance of individual differences in research.
  • This omission is a notable shortcoming in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of individual differences in robust theory testing.
  • To present research programs that effectively incorporate individual variations.
  • To apply the concept of individual differences to the mechanisms discussed in the target article.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing research methodologies.
  • Conceptual application of individual differences to theoretical frameworks.
  • Examination of proposed mechanisms within the target article through the lens of individual variation.

Main Results:

  • Individual differences significantly impact the validity and generalizability of scientific findings.
  • Incorporating individual variations strengthens theoretical models and empirical evidence.
  • The commentary provides a framework for future research that accounts for participant heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Future research should prioritize the investigation of individual differences to advance scientific understanding.
  • Acknowledging and studying individual variations is essential for comprehensive theory development and testing.
  • This perspective enriches the interpretation of research findings and proposes avenues for more nuanced scientific inquiry.