Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 17, 2025
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
Published on: February 10, 2016
Comparing the quantitative fit-testing results of half-mask respirators with various skin barriers in a crossover
R S Trehan1, E P McDonnell1, J V McCoy2
1Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Background:
Clinicians around the world are experiencing skin breakdown due to the prolonged usage of masks while working long hours to treat patients with COVID-19. The skin damage is a result of the increased friction and pressure at the mask-skin barrier. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have been applying various skin barriers to prevent and ameliorate skin breakdown. However, there are no studies to our knowledge that assess the safety and efficacy of using these skin barriers without compromising a sufficient mask-face seal.
Aim:
To conduct the largest study to date of various skin barriers and seal integrity with quantitative fit testing (QNFT).
Methods:
This pilot study explored whether the placement of a silicone scar sheet (ScarAway®), Cavilon™, or Tegaderm™ affects 3M™ half-face mask respirator barrier integrity when compared to no barrier using QNFT. Data were collected from nine clinicians at an academic level 1 trauma centre in New Jersey.
Findings:
The silicone scar sheet resulted in the lowest adequate fit, whereas Cavilon provided the highest fit factor when compared to other interventions (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
These findings help inform clinicians considering barriers for comfort when wearing facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic and for future pandemics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:16Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs