Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovative Approaches to Understanding Plant Structure-Function Relationships for Climate-Resilient Crops
Published on: July 12, 2024
Differences in leaf anatomy determines temperature response of leaf hydraulic and mesophyll CO2 conductance in
Balasaheb V Sonawane1, Nuria K Koteyeva2, Daniel M Johnson3
1School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
Abstract:
Leaf hydraulic and mesophyll CO2 conductance are both influenced by leaf anatomical traits, however it is poorly understood how the temperature response of these conductances differs between C4 and C3 species with distinct leaf anatomy. This study investigated the temperature response of leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf ), stomatal (gs ) and mesophyll (gm ) conductance to CO2 , and leaf anatomical traits in phylogenetically related Panicum antidotale (C4 ) and P. bisulcatum (C3 ) grasses. The C4 species had lower hydraulic conductance outside xylem (Kox ) and Kleaf compared with the C3 species. However, the C4 species had higher gm compared with the C3 species. Traits associated with leaf water movement, Kleaf and Kox , increased with temperature more in the C3 than in the C4 species, whereas traits related to carbon uptake, Anet and gm , increased more with temperature in the C4 than the C3 species. Our findings demonstrate that, in addition to a CO2 concentrating mechanism, outside-xylem leaf anatomy in the C4 species P. antidotale favours lower water movement through the leaf and stomata that provides an additional advantage for greater leaf carbon uptake relative to water loss with increasing leaf temperature than in the C3 species P. bisulcatum.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Light Acquisition
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Regulation of Transpiration by Stomata
Xylem and Transpiration-driven Transport of Resources

