Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.6K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.6K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

110
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
110
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

196
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
196
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.2K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.2K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.6K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.6K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.7K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct temporal patterns of beta bursts differentiate successful and failed movement cancellation.

iScience·2026
Same author

Transcriptome assemblies of Cynanchum wilfordii and its related species (Apocynaceae).

BMC research notes·2026
Same author

ERP prediction error responses under temporal constraints.

Brain research·2025
Same author

Spatiotemporal dynamics of mouse tracking reveal general and selective control mechanisms of the congruency sequence effect in Simon tasks.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Inhibition Resolves Simon Conflict: Evidence From Electroencephalogram Decoding.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Sharing an automatic link is crucial in the congruency sequence effect between spatial conflict tasks.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.4K

Cross-task congruency sequence effect without the contribution of multiple expectancy.

Chae Eun Lim1, Yang Seok Cho1

  • 1School of Psychology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Acta Psychologica
|February 20, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reveals that top-down cognitive control, not feature integration from prior trials, drives the cross-task congruency sequence effect (CSE). The findings clarify how cognitive control mechanisms optimize performance.

Keywords:
Cognitive controlCongruency sequence effectFeature integrationMultiple expectancy

More Related Videos

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.4K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • The congruency sequence effect (CSE) is often studied using designs minimizing confounds like feature integration and contingency learning.
  • Top-down cognitive control is crucial for managing task demands and resolving conflict.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine cross-task CSE data, incorporating preceding trial congruency type.
  • To determine if cross-task CSE is confounded by feature integration from n-2 trials or multiple expectancies.
  • To investigate the independent contributions of top-down control and bottom-up feature integration.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of existing data from a confound-minimized cross-task design.
  • Inclusion of preceding trial congruency repetition type as a variable.
  • Statistical analysis to assess interactions and main effects.

Main Results:

  • The cross-task CSE interacted with S-R mapping arbitrariness and response mode, independent of preceding congruency repetition.
  • Feature integration from n-2 trials showed a lingering effect, but its directionality depended on congruency repetition type.
  • Multiple expectancies did not significantly confound the cross-task CSE.

Conclusions:

  • Top-down cognitive control, triggered by conflict, is the primary driver of the cross-task CSE.
  • Feature integration's influence on CSE is minimal when data from congruent and alternating trials are combined.
  • Cognitive control and feature integration operate independently to enhance task performance.