Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Microdiskectomy Procedures by Patient Admission Status
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Emily K Chapman1, Tahera Doctor1, Jonathan S Gal2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Objective:
We sought to compare the cost and in-hospital outcomes following lumbar microdiskectomy procedures by admission type.
Methods:
Patients undergoing lumbar microdiskectomy at a single institution from 2008 to 2016 following an elective admission (EL) were compared against those who were admitted from the emergency department (ED) or from elsewhere within or outside the hospital system (TR) for their perioperative outcomes and cost. Multivariable modeling controlled for age, sex, self-reported race, Elixhauser comorbidity score, payer type, number of segments, and procedure length.
Results:
Of the 1249 patients included in this study, 1116 (89.4%) were admitted electively while 123 (9.8%) were admitted from the ED and 10 (0.8%) were transferred from other hospitals. EL patients had significantly lower comorbidity burdens (P < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed that transfer admission patients experienced significantly longer hospitalizations (ED: +1.7 days; P < 0.0001; TR: +5.3 days; P < 0.0001) and higher direct costs (ED: $1889; P < 0.0001; TR: $7001; P < 0.0001) compared with EL patients. Despite these risks, ED and TR patients only had increased odds of nonhome discharge compared with EL patients (ED: 3.4; P = 0.002; TR: 7.9; P = 0.02).
Conclusions:
Patients admitted as transfers and from the ED had significantly increased hospitalization lengths of stay and direct costs compared with electively admitted patients.
