Related Experiment Videos
Stone fragility--a new therapeutic distinction
1Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
The Journal of Urology
|May 1, 1988
Summary
Stone composition significantly impacts extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) retreatment rates. Different stone types exhibit varying fragility, influencing fragmentation success and treatment selection for urinary calculi.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a common treatment for urinary calculi.
- Stone composition is known to influence treatment outcomes, but the specific mechanical properties related to fragmentation remain under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between urinary stone composition, structural characteristics, and fragmentation susceptibility to extracorporeal shock waves.
- To introduce the concept of "stone fragility" as a critical factor in ESWL treatment planning.
Main Methods:
- In vitro analysis of urinary calculi (1.1–3.0 cm) of varying compositions (calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, struvite/apatite).
- Fine detail radiography to assess structural differences.
- In vitro fragmentation using Dornier HM3 lithotriptor (200 shocks at 18 KV) and determination of fragment size distribution via a two mm sieve.
- Measurement of linear density using single photon emission absorptiometry.
Main Results:
- ESWL retreatment rates varied by stone composition: COM (10.3%), COD (2.8%), struvite/apatite (6.4%).
- In vitro fragmentation showed significant differences: COD and uric acid (100% fragmentation), COM (64%), struvite (57%), brushite (47%), and cystine (16%).
- Linear density correlated with radio-density, not stone fragility.
Conclusions:
- Urinary calculi of different compositions exhibit distinct structural properties influencing their fragility and response to shock wave lithotripsy.
- Stone fragility, determined by composition and structure, is a crucial factor that should be considered alongside stone size in ESWL treatment selection.