Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Reliability and validity of Midwifery - Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) scale: A tool to improve collaborative
Oluwatosin O Onibokun1, Erin M Morelli2, Jessica L Illuzzi1
1Yale School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Section of Obstetrics and Midwifery, New Haven, CT, United States.
Objective:
In recent decades, there has been a call to foster effective collaborative models of practice between midwives and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in the United States in order to improve clinician satisfaction and outcomes for childbearing women. Currently, there is no existing validated scale that measures the collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units. We sought to develop and validate a Midwifery- Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) Scale that measures obstetricians' attitudes towards collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units.
Design:
Validation study. The items in the questionnaire to be validated were developed de novo by the authors, based on their experiences and expertise in collaborative practice as well as by incorporating key principles of effective collaborative practice documented in the literature. The questionnaire was then piloted among 13 content experts.
Setting:
Anonymous online survey conducted in the United States.
Participants:
We validated the questionnaire among 471 obstetricians in the United States from Sept 2019 to March 2020. The respondents included general obstetrician and gynecologists (OB/GYN) attendings, OB/GYN hospitalists, maternal fetal medicine (MFM) fellows and MFM attendings who practice on a labor and birth unit in the United States.
Measurements And Findings:
We performed reliability analysis of the a priori items. We measured concurrent validity with an existing scale that measures inter-professional collaboration between nurses and physicians. We also correlated our scale with concerns for liability when working in a collaborative practice with midwives. Lastly, we measured discriminant validity with a single item burn out scale. The novel MOC Scale demonstrated construct and concurrent validity, and high inter-item reliability (a=0.93). The MOC Scale correlated with concerns about liability (r=0.63, p <0.001) but was not associated with burnout indicating the uniqueness of the new construct.
Key Conclusions:
The MOC Scale is validated to assess collaboration between obstetricians and midwives on labor and birth units from an obstetrician's perspective IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The MOC Scale can be used as a tool in clinical practice, to assess and foster effective collaboration between obstetricians and midwives from an obstetricians' perspective especially when used in conjunction with other tools that take into the account the perspectives of midwives and childbearing women.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
07:11Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Nursing Evaluation
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...