Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement
Lorenzo Ismael Perez-Sanchez1, Julia Gutierrez-Vazquez2, Maria Satrustegui-Lapetra3
1Department of Radiology, Complejo Asistencial de Segovia, C/Luis Erik Clavería Neurólogo, s/n, 40002, Segovia, Spain. lorenzoips@gmail.com.
Purpose:
To evaluate the reliability and agreement between Fully Refocused Steady-State magnetic resonance sequences (FRSS) and the IOLMaster® 500 optical biometer for measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL).
Methods:
In a sample of 32 healthy volunteers, separate observers measured the ACD and AL of both eyes using both techniques (inter-method) and through repeated FRSS measurements (interobserver) and by the same observer (intraobserver). We employed the Bland-Altman method to determine the agreement between FRSS and partial coherence interferometry (using the IOLMaster®) and the interobserver and intraobserver variability, providing the limits of agreement (LoA, or mean difference ± 1.96 SD). Correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients were also provided.
Results:
For ACD measurements with FRSS in pseudo-color scale, we obtained an LoA of 0.016 ± 0.266 mm compared with partial coherence interferometry. For AL with FRSS in greyscale, the LoA was 0.019 ± 0.383 mm. Maximum interobserver variability showed a - 0.036 ± 0.247 mm LoA for ACD with FRSS in pseudo-color scale. Maximum intraobserver variability was 0.000 ± 0.157 mm LoA for AL with FRSS in greyscale.
Conclusions:
ACD and AL measurements using FRSS sequencing present high LoA and reliability when compared with partial coherence interferometry using the IOLMaster® 500. The results were better for FRSS in pseudo-color scale in ACD determination and for FRSS in greyscale in AL determination. FRSS would not be recommended for IOL power calculation due to variability of AL measurement.
More Related Videos
07:44In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
06:55Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
Published on: June 6, 2017