Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

423
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
423
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.1K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.1K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

27.4K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
27.4K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

300
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
300
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

7.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pre-Posterior Distributions in Drug Development and Their Properties.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Probability of success and group sequential designs.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2023
Same author

On implementing Jeffreys' substitution likelihood for Bayesian inference concerning the medians of unknown distributions.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2022
Same author

From innovative thinking to pharmaceutical industry implementation: Some success stories.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2022
Same author

Response-adaptive clinical trials: case studies in the medical literature.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2016
Same author

Simulation-based sample-sizing and power calculations in logistic regression with partial prior information.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.7K

Optimising the trade-off between type I and II error rates in the Bayesian context.

Rosalind J Walley1, Andrew P Grieve1

  • 1Statistical Sciences and Innovation, UCB Pharma, Slough, UK.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|February 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study optimizes the trade-off between Type I and Type II errors in decision-making studies using Bayesian statistical analysis. It provides a scientific basis for setting error rates based on study context and resource limitations.

Keywords:
Bayesiandecision criteriadesign priorpre-posterior distributiontrial designtype I error

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.7K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.2K

Area of Science:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Statistical Inference
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • Traditional hypothesis testing uses arbitrary Type I and Type II error rates (e.g., 5% and 10-20%).
  • These standard rates often neglect the specific costs of errors and prior beliefs about the study outcome.
  • Frequentist approaches have been challenged for not optimizing these error rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the optimization of Type I and Type II error trade-offs in studies with planned Bayesian statistical analysis.
  • To provide a framework for stakeholders to determine appropriate error rates.
  • To offer algebraic solutions for normally distributed data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian statistical framework for analysis.
  • Investigated the trade-off between Type I and Type II error rates under resource constraints.
  • Derived algebraic results for normally distributed data.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a method to optimize the balance between Type I and Type II errors.
  • Provided a scientific foundation for setting context-specific error rates.
  • Derived specific results applicable to normally distributed data.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian analysis allows for optimizing the trade-off between Type I and Type II errors.
  • This approach offers a more scientifically rigorous basis for error rate selection than traditional methods.
  • The findings support informed discussions among stakeholders regarding appropriate error rates in research studies.