Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

407
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
407
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

6.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
6.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

264
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
264
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.2K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.7K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal association of switching to dual cigarette and e-cigarette use vs. continued exclusive cigarette smoking with tobacco-specific nitrosamine and nicotine intake.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

CACE-MM: using mixed methods to strengthen causal inference in medicine and public health.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Large language models for full-text methods assessment: a case study on mediation analysis.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

A <i>Cautionary Tale</i> on Integrating Studies with Disparate Outcome Measures for Causal Inference.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for depression using EHRs from two health systems.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

The TARGET guideline for reporting observational studies of interventions.

Nature medicine·2026
Same journal

Modeling treatment effects on absorbing outcomes in clinical trials: Leveraging longitudinal and ordinal data for efficiency gains.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K

Calibrating validation samples when accounting for measurement error in intervention studies.

Benjamin Ackerman1, Juned Siddique2, Elizabeth A Stuart1,3,4

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses measurement error in lifestyle intervention trials by adjusting external validation samples to improve transportability. Methods are presented to reduce bias when applying validation data to trial data, using dietary intake as an example.

Keywords:
Lifestyle intervention trialmeasurement errornutritionpropensity scorestransportability

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.5K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.6K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Nutritional Science

Background:

  • Lifestyle intervention trials often rely on self-reported outcomes, like dietary intake, introducing measurement error.
  • This error can significantly impact the estimation of treatment effects in intervention studies.
  • External validation studies, using biomarkers alongside self-reports, can correct for measurement error but assume data transportability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel approach for adjusting external validation samples to enhance transportability to intervention trials.
  • To formally investigate the conditions under which bias due to poor transportability may arise.
  • To demonstrate the practical application of these methods using real-world trial and validation data.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an adjustment method for external validation samples to better match intervention trial samples.
  • Theoretical investigation into the sources and extent of bias from non-transportable inferences.
  • Simulation studies to assess the performance of the proposed methods.
  • Application to the PREMIER lifestyle intervention trial and the OPEN validation study.

Main Results:

  • The proposed adjustment approach can mitigate bias arising from non-transportable validation data.
  • Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the methods in correcting for measurement error under varying transportability conditions.
  • The methods were successfully illustrated using self-reported sodium intake data from a lifestyle intervention trial.

Conclusions:

  • Adjusting validation samples improves the accuracy of measurement error correction in lifestyle intervention trials.
  • Understanding and addressing transportability is crucial for reliable estimation of intervention effects.
  • The developed methods offer a valuable tool for researchers analyzing self-reported outcomes in public health and nutritional studies.