Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
[How to interpret the certainty of evidence based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and
L Schwingshackl1, G Rüschemeyer2, J J Meerpohl3,2
1Institut für Evidenz in der Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Deutschland. schwingshackl@ifem.uni-freiburg.de.
Background:
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a widely used approach in the fields of medicine and public health to assess the outcome-specific certainty of the evidence in systematic reviews.
Objectives:
To make the GRADE approach comprehensible in order to facilitate the reading, understanding and interpretation of GRADE assessments in systematic reviews.
Materials And Methods:
Presentation of the procedure of the GRADE approach using the example of a Cochrane review on selenium supplements in the prevention of prostate cancer.
Results:
GRADE provides criteria for rating the certainty of evidence. GRADE's approach to rating the certainty of the evidence is based on a four-level system (high, moderate, low, very low). The GRADE approach classifies bodies of randomized controlled trials as initially starting at high certainty and bodies of observational studies at initially starting at low certainty. By assessing the five domains (risk for bias, inconsistency, indirectness, insufficient precision and publication bias), certainty can be rated down or, in the case of large effects, existing dose-response relationships or plausible confounders, rated up.
Conclusions:
GRADE is a consistent and transparent approach for rating the certainty of a body of evidence by offering explicit key questions.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves
Confidence Coefficient
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Statistical Significance