Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Diagnostic Accuracy of Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), PEDS Developmental Milestones, and PEDS
Sharmila Banerjee Mukherjee1, Sangeeta Verma2, Suvasini Sharma2
1Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, Bangla Sahib Road, New Delhi, 110001, India. theshormi@gmail.com.
Insights
The Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) tools are not suitable for developmental screening in Indian children under two years old. Their diagnostic accuracy is suboptimal for this age group.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Early developmental screening is crucial for identifying potential delays in young children.
- Validated screening tools are essential for accurate assessment in diverse populations.
- The Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) suite is widely used but requires evaluation in specific cultural contexts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), PEDS Developmental Milestones (PEDS:DM), and PEDS Combined for developmental screening.
- To assess the suitability of Hindi translations of these tools for Indian children under two years of age.
Main Methods:
- A hospital-based diagnostic accuracy study was conducted over 17 months.
- 180 children under 24 months were enrolled, excluding those with severe illnesses or known neurodevelopmental disorders.
- Standardized Hindi translations of PEDS and PEDS:DM were used as index tests, with the Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII) as the reference standard.
Main Results:
- The PEDS tool showed a sensitivity of 33.3% and specificity of 93.2%.
- PEDS:DM and PEDS Combined demonstrated 100% sensitivity but low specificity (34.5%).
- The Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII) identified only 3 children with developmental delay.
Conclusions:
- Hindi translations of PEDS, PEDS:DM, and PEDS Combined exhibit suboptimal diagnostic accuracy.
- These tools are not currently suitable for the developmental screening of Indian children under two years of age.
- Further research is needed to develop or adapt culturally appropriate and accurate developmental screening tools for this population.
Objective:
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), PEDS Developmental Milestones (PEDS:DM) and PEDS Combined for developmental screening of Indian children aged less than 2 y.
Method:
A hospital-based study of diagnostic accuracy was conducted over 17 mo. Children under 24 mo (n = 180) were enrolled after exclusion of severe illnesses or known neurodevelopment disorders. The index tools included standardized Hindi translations of PEDS and PEDS:DM. The reference tool was Developmental Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII). Both were administered by blinded researchers. Parameters of diagnostic accuracy were computed.
Results:
There were 13 (7.2%) failures in PEDS, 119 (66.1%) in PEDS:DM and 119 (66.1%) in PEDS Combined. DASII identified 3 children with developmental delay. Sensitivity (Sn) [95% CI] of PEDS was 33.3 [0.8-90.6] and Specificity (Sp) 93.2 [88.5-96.5]. The Sn and Sp of both PEDS:DM and PEDS Combined were 100 [29.2-100] and 34.5 [27.5-42.0], respectively.
Conclusions:
Hindi translations of PEDS, PEDS:DM and PEDS Combined are not suitable for developmental screening of children less than 2 y due to suboptimal diagnostic accuracy.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
09:16Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018