Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.2K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.2K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.8K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

424
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
424
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

172
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
172
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

1.9K
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
1.9K
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

297
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...
297

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moses illusions, fast and slow.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Adieu Bias: Debiasing Intuitions Among French Speakers.

Psychologica Belgica·2024
Same author

Further advancing fast-and-slow theorizing.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Analytic Engagement and the Perils of Reframing the Dual- and Single-Process Models Debate.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2021
Same author

Intuition rather than deliberation determines selfish and prosocial choices.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2020
Same journal

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Children's Third-Party Punishment Reveals a Genuine Concern for Fairness and Justice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Chaos Theory and Child Development: Quantifying Nonlinear Pathways of Growth.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Formal Modeling as Theoretical Glue between Laboratory and Naturalistic Studies of Memory.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Growing Technological Opacity and the Social Brain.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same journal

Bringing the Reading Sciences Into the Classroom: Insights for Phonics Instruction.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K

On Dual- and Single-Process Models of Thinking.

Wim De Neys1

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie du Développement et de l'Éducation de l'Enfant (LaPsyDE), Université de Paris and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|February 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The long-standing debate on dual-process versus single-process models of thinking lacks sufficient evidence for resolution. This article argues the debate is irrelevant, as it does not advance our understanding of cognitive mechanisms.

Keywords:
System 1System 2deliberationdual-process modelintuitionsingle-process model

More Related Videos

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.3K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.1K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.3K
Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • Dual-process models propose distinct intuition and deliberation processes.
  • Single-process models suggest these are differences in degree, not kind.
  • This debate has persisted in psychology for over 30 years.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the dual-process/single-process debate in cognitive psychology.
  • To demonstrate the lack of conclusive evidence supporting either model.
  • To argue for the irrelevance of this debate to understanding thinking mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of key arguments and counterarguments.
  • Analysis of empirical evidence presented by both dual- and single-model proponents.
  • Philosophical examination of the debate's implications for cognitive science.

Main Results:

  • No current evidence definitively resolves the dual-process versus single-process debate.
  • Both sides of the debate present arguments that are not conclusively supported.
  • The resolution of this debate does not contribute to understanding the underlying cognitive mechanisms of thought.

Conclusions:

  • The dual-process/single-process debate in cognitive psychology is empirically undecidable.
  • The focus on this debate hinders progress in understanding the mechanisms of human cognition.
  • Future research should shift focus from this debate to the actual processing mechanisms.