Long-term growth patterns in children born with cleft lip and/or palate. A systematic review

Rocío Gallego Sobrino1, Iris Iglesia-Altaba2, Luis A Moreno-Aznar2

  • 1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department. Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet.

Nutricion Hospitalaria
|February 24, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Children with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) generally show similar growth patterns and nutritional status compared to peers. However, vulnerable groups like those under 5 or with syndromes may experience differences.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Growth and Development
  • Cleft Lip and Palate Research

Background:

  • Children with cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) may face nutritional challenges impacting growth due to feeding difficulties.
  • Early nutritional status in CLP patients might influence long-term overweight risk.
  • Understanding growth and body composition is crucial for managing CLP patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review literature on the nutritional prognosis, body composition, and growth patterns (ages 2-10) in children with CLP.
  • To investigate the impact of early nutrition on the long-term risk of overweight in CLP patients.
  • To synthesize current evidence on growth trajectories in surgically treated CLP children.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search on growth and body composition in 2-10 year-old CLP children.
  • Inclusion of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies from Pubmed and Scopus databases.
  • Analysis of 6 selected studies from an initial pool of 2,983 articles.

Main Results:

  • Heterogeneous study samples and methodologies were observed.
  • Discrepant findings on growth differences between CLP children and controls (3 studies found differences, 3 did not).
  • Longitudinal studies showed no significant differences in BMI z-scores or growth curves; differences were noted in younger, syndromic, or adopted children.

Conclusions:

  • Limited literature exists comparing growth in CLP children versus controls.
  • Evidence does not confirm significantly different growth patterns or poorer nutritional status in non-syndromic CLP children (ages 2-10) compared to peers.
  • Further research is needed, particularly focusing on vulnerable CLP populations.
Abstract