Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

360
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
360
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

969
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
969
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

402
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
402
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

264
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
264
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

251
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
251
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of hepatic and renal effects of acute and subacute oral exposure to bromochloromethane in rats.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2025
Same author

Episodic Exposure to Eucalyptus Smoke during Sperm Maturation Impairs Sperm Motility in Long Evans Rats.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Dermal irritancy assessment of microbial toxins and pesticidal contaminants found in recreational water using two- and three-dimensional human skin models.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2025
Same author

Mating disruption of Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using microencapsulated pheromone in cotton.

Pest management science·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages Demonstrate Distinct Responses to Ambient Particulate Matter in a Polarization State- and Particle Seasonality-Specific Manner.

Chemical research in toxicology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

11.7K

Censoring Trace-Level Environmental Data: Statistical Analysis Considerations to Limit Bias.

Barbara Jane George1, Leslie Gains-Germain2, Kristin Broms2

  • 1Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., MD-B105-01, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.

Environmental Science & Technology
|February 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Analyzing trace-level environmental data, this study found that while threshold/2 substitution showed minimal bias, modern statistical methods and including all data are superior. Investigators must avoid censoring-related bias in environmental health studies.

Keywords:
PAHdetection limitestimating the meanmaximum likelihood estimationnondetectregression on order statisticsreporting levelsimulation study

More Related Videos

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.1K
Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
10:44

Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies

Published on: July 1, 2016

11.7K
Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.1K
Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Trace-level environmental data often contain values below detection limits, posing challenges for accurate health risk assessment.
  • Low-concentration exposures to single or multiple chemicals can have significant health implications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess bias in statistical measures (mean, standard deviation) of trace-level environmental data using various censoring approaches.
  • To compare the performance of different statistical methods for handling censored data in environmental exposure assessments.

Main Methods:

  • A cook stove case study analyzed dibenzo[a,h]anthracene concentrations using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
  • Evaluated censoring methods including threshold/2 substitution, maximum likelihood estimation, robust regression, Kaplan-Meier, and data omission.
  • Simulated measurement data from log-normal distributions at varying censoring levels (30%, 50%, 80%) to compare statistical approaches.

Main Results:

  • Threshold/2 substitution demonstrated the least bias among simple methods but was inferior to modern after-censoring statistical approaches.
  • All after-censoring methods were less accurate than analyses that included all measurement data.
  • Differences in group means varied significantly based on censoring decisions and chosen statistical methods.

Conclusions:

  • Censoring environmental data can introduce significant bias, impacting the accuracy of exposure assessments and health risk evaluations.
  • Investigators should prioritize statistical methods that minimize bias, ideally by including all available measurement data.
  • Careful consideration of censoring and distributional assumptions is crucial to avoid erroneous conclusions in environmental health research.