Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with urinary system cancers: a meta-analysis
1Sichuan Provincial Center for Gynecology and Breast Diseases (Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University), Luzhou, Sichuan, China. tiangang@swmu.edu.cn.
Objective:
The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), an inexpensive and widely available hematologic marker of inflammation, has been linked to tumor progression, metastatic spread, and poor patient prognosis. The objective of this study is to explore the prognostic value of SII in patients with urinary system cancers (USCs).
Materials And Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases from inception to May 10, 2020, to identify potential studies that assessed the prognostic role of the SII in USCs. The hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the correlation between SII and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in USCs patients.
Results:
A total of 12 studies, including 2,693 USCs patients, were eventually included in the meta-analysis. Elevated SII index was significantly associated with poor OS (HR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.17-1.39, p<0.001), PFS (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.25-1.82, p<0.001) and CSS (HR=3.42, 95% CI: 1.49-7.91, p<0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that higher SII than a cutoff value could predict poor OS in renal cell carcinoma (HR=1.23, p<0.001), prostate carcinoma (HR=1.95, p<0.001), bladder carcinoma (HR=5.40, p<0.001), testicular cancer (HR=6.09, p<0.001) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (HR=2.19, p<0.001). Besides, these associations did not vary significantly by tumor subtypes and stages of USCs, sample sizes, study types, cutoff value defining elevated NLR, treatment methods, and NOS scores.
Conclusions:
SII may serve as a useful prognostic indicator in USCs and contribute to prognosis evaluation and treatment strategy formulation. However, more well-designed studies are warranted to verify our findings.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
06:05Author Spotlight: Multiplex Immunofluorescence Combined with Spatial Image Analysis for the Clinical and Biological Assessment of the Tumor Microenvironment
Published on: June 2, 2023