Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
Immunohistochemical characteristics of lateral bone augmentation using different biomaterials around chronic
Jae-Kook Cha1, Rafael Pla2, Fabio Vignoletti2
1Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, South Korea.
Aim:
To investigate the immunohistochemical characteristics of a highly porous synthetic bone substitute and a cross-linked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration.
Methods:
Three experimental groups were randomly allocated at chronic peri-implant dehiscence defect in 8 beagle dogs: (i) biphasic calcium phosphate covered by a cross-linked collagen membrane (test group), (ii) deproteinized bovine bone mineral covered by a natural collagen membrane (positive control) and (iii) no treatment (negative control). After 8 and 16 weeks of submerged healing, dissected tissue blocks were processed for immunohistochemical analysis. Seven antibodies were used to detect the remaining osteogenic and angiogenic potential, and quantitative immunohistochemical analysis was done by software.
Results:
The antigen reactivity of alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher in the test group compared to the positive and negative controls, and it maintained till 16 weeks. The intensity of osteocalcin was significantly higher in the positive control at 8 weeks than the other groups, but significantly decreased at 16 weeks and no difference was found between the groups. A significant large number of TRAP-positive cells were observed in the test group mainly around the remaining particles at 16 weeks. The angiogenic potential was comparable between the groups showing no difference in the expression of transglutaminase II and vascular endothelial growth factor.
Conclusion:
Guided bone regeneration combining a highly porous biphasic calcium phosphate synthetic biomaterial with a crosslinked collagen membrane, resulted in extended osteogenic potential when compared to the combination of deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a native collagen membrane.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
06:05Author Spotlight: Enhancing Bone Regeneration with Vascularized Artificial Cartilage Integration
Published on: July 14, 2023