Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Pathological assessment of chronic kidney disease with DWI: Is there an added value for diffusion kurtosis imaging?
Wei Mao1, Yuqin Ding1, Xiaoqiang Ding2
1Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Background:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health problem, precise functional and pathological assessment is beneficial to better treatment. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can evaluate non-Gaussian diffusion and may help to assess renal pathology and function.
Purpose:
To assess pathological and functional alterations in CKD using DKI compared with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).
Study Type:
Prospective study.
Population:
70 CKD patients and 20 healthy volunteers.
Field Strength:
1.5 T.
Assessment:
All participants underwent DKI, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD), and mean kurtosis (MK) of renal parenchyma were acquired. Correlation between renal parenchymal ADC, MD, MK, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), pathological scores were assessed. The diagnostic efficacy of ADC, MD, and MK for assessing the degree of renal pathological injury were compared.
Statistical Tests:
ANOVA, Spearman correlation analysis, and ROC curve analysis.
Results:
The cortical ADC, MD were significantly higher than medulla for all participants, whereas medullary MK was significantly higher than cortex (P < 0.01). Whether eGFR reduced or not, renal parenchymal MK were significantly higher in patients than controls (P < 0.05). Positive correlation was found between eGFR and ADC (cortex, r = 0.562; medulla, r = 0.527), and negative correlation between eGFR and MK (cortex, r = -0.786; medulla, r = -0.709) (all P < 0.001). There was positive correlation between MK and glomerular injury (cortex, r = 0.681; medulla, r = 0.652), tubulointerstitial lesion (cortex, r = 0.650; medulla, r = 0.599) (all P < 0.001). For discrimination between mild and m-s renal injury group, the AUC values of ADC, MD, MK were cortex: 0.723, 0.655, 0.864 and medulla: 0.718, 0.581, 0.829. The AUC values of ADC, MD, MK were cortex: 0.708, 0.679, 0.770 and medulla: 0.713, 0.830, 0.780 for differentiating control group from mild renal injury group.
Data Conclusion:
DKI is practicable for noninvasive assessment of renal pathology and function of CKD, DKI offer better diagnostic performance than DWI. Evidence Level 1 Technical Efficacy 2.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

