Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Dacomitinib in first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness
Javier Aguilar-Serra1, Vicente Gimeno-Ballester2, Alfonso Pastor-Clerigues1,3
1Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract:
Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib in patients newly diagnosed with advanced NSCLC EGFR-positive in the context of Spain. Materials & methods: A partitioned survival model was developed including costs, utilities and disutilities to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio when treating with dacomitinib versus gefitinib. Results: Dacomitinib presented higher QALYs (0.51) compared with gefitinib (0.45). Dacomitinib costs were €33,061 in comparison with €26,692 for gefitinib arm. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €111,048 was obtained for dacomitinib. Conclusion: Dacomitinib was more effective in terms of QALYs gained than gefitinib. However, to obtain a cost-effectiveness alternative, a discount greater than 25% in dacomitinib acquisition cost is required.
Insights
Dacomitinib offers superior effectiveness in treating advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC, yielding more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). However, its higher cost necessitates a significant discount to achieve cost-effectiveness compared to gefitinib.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations requires effective first-line treatments.
- Dacomitinib and gefitinib are targeted therapies for EGFR-positive NSCLC.
- Assessing treatment cost-effectiveness is crucial for healthcare resource allocation in Spain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dacomitinib versus gefitinib as a first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC in Spain.
- To compare the clinical and economic outcomes of these two treatment strategies.
Main Methods:
- A partitioned survival model was utilized to simulate patient outcomes.
- The model incorporated costs, utilities, and disutilities to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for dacomitinib compared to gefitinib.
Main Results:
- Dacomitinib demonstrated higher QALYs (0.51) compared to gefitinib (0.45).
- The acquisition cost for dacomitinib was €33,061, versus €26,692 for gefitinib.
- The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for dacomitinib was calculated at €111,048.
Conclusions:
- Dacomitinib is more effective, providing greater QALY gains than gefitinib in this patient population.
- For dacomitinib to be considered a cost-effective alternative, a discount exceeding 25% on its acquisition cost is necessary.
- These findings have implications for treatment guidelines and drug pricing in Spain.
More Related Videos
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
09:38Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers