Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during
Declan A Patton1, Aditya N Belwadi1, Jalaj Maheshwari1
1Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Insights
Child restraint systems (CRS) significantly reduce crash risks. Extended-use rearward-facing CRS with support legs and lower tethers improve toddler safety in frontal and rear impacts, reducing head and neck injuries.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric injury biomechanics
- Automotive safety engineering
- Child restraint system design
Background:
- Child restraint systems (CRS) are crucial for reducing child injury and mortality in motor vehicle crashes.
- Rearward-facing CRS offer greater protection for toddlers compared to forward-facing systems.
- Extended-use European CRS models allow rearward-facing use up to age six, incorporating support legs and lower tethers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of support legs in rearward-facing infant and extended-use convertible CRS during frontal impacts.
- To assess the effectiveness of lower tethers in rearward-facing extended-use convertible CRS during rear impacts.
- To compare ATD responses in extended-use convertible CRS in rearward- and forward-facing modes during frontal and rear impacts.
Main Methods:
- Sled tests were conducted using pediatric anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs).
- Evaluated CRS included infant and extended-use convertible models.
- Tested configurations involved frontal and rear impacts with and without support legs and lower tethers.
Main Results:
- Support legs in rearward-facing CRS reduced head injury metrics for pediatric ATDs in frontal impacts.
- Lower tethers reduced rearward rotation in rear impacts, improving head and neck injury metrics for older ATDs (Q6) but not younger ones (Q3).
- Forward-facing configurations showed higher neck injury metrics in frontal impacts, while rearward-facing configurations showed higher head injury metrics.
Conclusions:
- Support legs are effective in mitigating head and neck injuries for rearward-facing CRS in frontal impacts.
- Lower tethers show potential for improving safety in rear impacts, though ATD age is a factor.
- Further research is needed on interactions between ATDs, CRS, and vehicle components in rearward-facing frontal impacts.
Abstract:
A correctly used child restraint system (CRS) is associated with a substantial reduction of injury and mortality risks in motor vehicle crashes and epidemiologic data suggests that toddlers are provided greater protection when restrained in a rearward-facing CRS compared to a forward-facing CRS. Some 'extended-use' European CRS models can accommodate children up to six years rearward-facing and have a support (load) leg and/or a pair of lower (Swedish) tethers to reduce rotation during frontal and rear impacts, respectively. Laboratory studies have found that a support leg reduces head and neck injury metrics of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) younger than three years in rearward-facing CRS models during frontal impacts. The objectives of the current study were to perform sled tests to: (1) evaluate the effects of using a support leg in rearward-facing infant and extended-use convertible CRS models during frontal impacts, (2) evaluate the effects of using a pair of lower tethers in a rearward-facing extended-use convertible CRS model during rear impacts and (3) compare responses of ATDs in an extendeduse convertible CRS with a support leg and a pair of lower tethers in rearward- and forward-facing configurations during frontal and rear impacts. The presence of a support leg in rearward-facing infant and extended-use convertible CRS models in frontal impacts was associated with reductions in head injury metrics across a range of pediatric ATDs and neck injury metrics were below injury tolerance values. Other strategies in the design of rearward-facing CRS and front row vehicle seatbacks may be available to further reduce head injury metrics. Lower tethers reduced the rearward rotation of an extended-use convertible CRS toward the vehicle seatback in rear impacts and were typically associated with reductions in head and neck injury metrics for the Q6 ATD, but not the Q3 ATD. For frontal impacts, neck injury metrics were typically greater for ATDs in the forward-facing extended-use convertible CRS, whereas head injury metrics were typically greater for the rearward-facing condition (with a support leg and a pair of lower tethers). Interactions of the ATD head and/or the rearward-facing extended-use convertible CRS with the blocker plate in rearward-facing frontal impacts need to be further investigated.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
Support Reactions in Three Dimensions
Ball and Socket Joint is one of the supports allowing free rotation about any axis. This freedom of rotation is...
Rotation with Constant Angular Acceleration - II
The first...

