Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns: Is it a risk factor for long- term pediatric cardiovascular diseases of the

Noa Leybovitz-Haleluya1, Tamar Wainstock2, Gali Pariente1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Early Human Development
|February 26, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) patterns during delivery do not increase the risk of long-term cardiovascular problems in children. This study found no significant difference in pediatric cardiovascular hospitalizations between NRFHR and normal fetal heart rate groups.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Perinatal Medicine

Background:

  • Non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) patterns are a critical indicator of potential fetal distress during labor.
  • The long-term impact of NRFHR on offspring cardiovascular health remains an area of ongoing research.
  • Understanding these risks is crucial for optimizing perinatal care and long-term child health outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between NRFHR patterns and the risk of subsequent pediatric cardiovascular morbidity.
  • To compare cardiovascular-related hospitalizations in offspring born via cesarean delivery due to NRFHR versus those born due to labor dystocia with normal fetal heart rate.
  • To provide evidence-based insights into the long-term health consequences of intrapartum fetal monitoring findings.

Main Methods:

  • Population-based cohort study including singletons born between 1999-2014.
  • Comparison of cardiovascular morbidity hospitalizations between offspring born by cesarean delivery due to NRFHR and those born due to labor dystocia.
  • Utilized Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze cumulative incidence and adjust for confounders.
  • Defined cardiovascular morbidity based on ICD-9 codes recorded in hospital records.

Main Results:

  • The study included 9956 newborns; 5810 (58%) were born by cesarean delivery due to NRFHR, and 4146 (42%) due to labor dystocia.
  • Long-term cardiovascular-related hospitalization rates were similar between the NRFHR group (0.8%) and the labor dystocia group (0.7%).
  • Cox proportional hazards analysis, controlling for gestational age, found no significant association between NRFHR patterns and subsequent pediatric cardiovascular morbidity (Adjusted HR = 0.8, p=0.376).

Conclusions:

  • Intrapartum non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns, as assessed in this study, do not appear to elevate the risk for long-term pediatric cardiovascular morbidity.
  • The findings suggest that cesarean delivery for NRFHR does not predispose offspring to future cardiovascular issues compared to delivery for labor dystocia.
  • Further research may explore other potential long-term outcomes or specific subgroups.
Abstract