Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pain and symptom management in youth: interdisciplinary perspectives, practices, and considerations.

Current opinion in supportive and palliative care·2026
Same author

An exploration of the association between knee confidence and knee biomechanics in people with knee osteoarthritis.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Longitudinal cohort study of the association between labral pathology and cartilage loss in high-impact athletes: the FORCe study.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Prognosis in entry-level physiotherapy programs: An Australian and New Zealand framework for developing knowledge and skills for musculoskeletal practice.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2026
Same author

Exploring the breadth of personal strengths used to overcome pain: A qualitative study of people living well with pain and people recovered from pain.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2026
Same author

Profiling Relationships Between Abdominal Pain, Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Pelvic Pain Bothersomeness in Young Females.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing
09:16

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Published on: February 16, 2017

17.3K

Do chronic low back pain subgroups derived from dynamic quantitative sensory testing exhibit differing

Martin Rabey1,2, Michelle Kendell1, Shani Koren1

  • 1School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.

Scandinavian Journal of Pain
|February 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dynamic quantitative sensory testing (QST) did not predict future pain and disability in low back pain (LBP) patients. Subgroup profiles varied slightly, but subgroup membership was not associated with long-term outcomes, suggesting QST may not be useful for predicting disability.

Keywords:
chronic low back painconditioned pain modulationquantitative sensory testingsubgroupstemporal summation

More Related Videos

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
04:42

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation

Published on: June 26, 2018

14.8K
Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain
05:10

Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain

Published on: August 30, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing
09:16

Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing

Published on: February 16, 2017

17.3K
Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
04:42

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation

Published on: June 26, 2018

14.8K
Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain
05:10

Back Mechanical Sensitivity Assessment in the Rat for Mechanistic Investigation of Chronic Back Pain

Published on: August 30, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Pain Research
  • Clinical Medicine

Background:

  • Low back pain (LBP) is a complex condition where pain sensitivity's role is not fully understood.
  • Dynamic quantitative sensory testing (QST) may offer insights into pain mechanisms in LBP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To subgroup patients with chronic LBP based on dynamic QST responses.
  • To profile these subgroups using clinical, psychological, and lifestyle variables.
  • To determine if subgroup membership predicts future pain intensity, LBP-related disability, and disability risk.

Main Methods:

  • 273 participants with chronic LBP underwent dynamic QST (conditioned pain modulation and temporal summation) and static QST.
  • Baseline data included demographics, clinical, psychological, and lifestyle factors.
  • Follow-up data at 12 months assessed pain intensity and LBP-related disability.

Main Results:

  • Four subgroups were identified based on dynamic QST: normal/facilitated conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation (TS).
  • Impaired CPM was linked to more painful body areas; facilitated TS correlated with heightened cold pain sensitivity.
  • No significant differences were found between subgroups regarding baseline clinical, psychological, or lifestyle variables.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic QST subgroup profiles showed limited differences among LBP patients.
  • Subgroup membership did not predict 12-month pain intensity, LBP-related disability, or disability risk.
  • The clinical utility of dynamic QST for predicting LBP outcomes remains uncertain, warranting further investigation into its role in pain sensitivity and potential treatment modifications.