Four right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit types

The most durable valved right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit for the repair of congenital heart defects in patients of different ages, sizes, and anatomic substrate remains uncertain.

We performed a retrospective analysis of 4 common right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits used in a single institution over 30 years, using univariable and multivariable models of time-to-failure to analyze freedom from conduit dysfunction, reintervention, and replacement.

Between 1988 and 2018, 959 right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits were implanted: 333 aortic homografts, 227 pulmonary homografts, 227 composite porcine valve conduits, and 172 bovine jugular vein conduits. Patients weighed 1.6 to 98.3 kg (median 15.3 kg), and median duration of follow-up was 11.4 years, with 505 (52.2%) conduits developing dysfunction, 165 (17.2%) requiring catheter intervention, and 415 (43.2%) being replaced. Greater patient weight, conduit z-score, type and position, as well as catheter intervention were predictors of freedom from replacement. Multivariable analysis demonstrated inferior durability for smaller composite porcine valve conduits, with excellent durability for larger diameter conduits of the same type. Bovine jugular vein conduit longevity was inferior to that of homografts in all but the smallest patients. Freedom from dysfunction at 8 years was 60.7% for aortic homografts, 72% for pulmonary homografts, 51.2% for composite porcine valve conduits, and 41.3% for bovine jugular vein conduits. Judicious oversizing of the conduit improved conduit durability in all patients, but to the greatest extent in patients weighing 5 to 20 kg.

Pulmonary and aortic homografts had greater durability than xenograft conduits, particularly in patients weighing 5 to 20 kg. Judicious oversizing was the most significant surgeon-modifiable factor affecting conduit longevity.