Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: The CASTLE-AF Trial
Johannes Brachmann1, Christian Sohns2, Dietrich Andresen3
1Department of Cardiology Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation burden after catheter ablation predicts outcomes in heart failure patients. Maintaining AF burden below 50% significantly reduces mortality and adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- The CASTLE-AF trial showed catheter ablation benefits patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and burden post-ablation on long-term outcomes in these patients remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between AF recurrence, AF burden, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients post-ablation.
- To determine if AF burden after catheter ablation influences the treatment benefits observed in the CASTLE-AF trial.
Main Methods:
- Subanalysis of 280 patients from the CASTLE-AF trial (128 ablation, 152 pharmacological therapy).
- Patients had implanted defibrillators with home monitoring for AF burden assessment (percentage of arrhythmia time per day).
- AF recurrence defined as any episode >30 seconds.
Main Results:
- AF burden at baseline did not predict primary endpoint or mortality.
- AF recurrence (>30s) showed no relationship with mortality or HF hospitalization.
- An AF burden <50% at 6 months post-ablation was linked to significantly lower composite outcomes (HR: 0.33) and mortality (HR: 0.23).
Conclusions:
- AF burden at 6 months post-ablation is a significant predictor of clinical outcomes in heart failure patients.
- Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes >30 seconds after ablation did not correlate with improved mortality or HF hospitalization.
- Maintaining a low AF burden (<50%) after catheter ablation is crucial for improving hard clinical outcomes in heart failure patients.
Objectives:
This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF.
Background:
The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown.
Methods:
The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day.
Results:
AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (<50%) or high (≥50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation.
Conclusions:
AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF [CASTLE-AF]; NCT00643188).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

