Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 16, 2025
Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
Published on: April 30, 2020
Seasonal Differences in the Cost and Engagement of Facebook Advertisements for a Physical Activity Smartphone App
Celine Northcott1, Rachel Curtis1, Svetlana Bogomolova2
1Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, 1067University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Purpose:
To evaluate the performance of Facebook advertisements for a physical activity smartphone app at different times of the year.
Design:
A repeated cross-sectional study examined the cost and engagement levels of advertisements during 3 time points: Post-Easter , Pre-Summer , and New Year .
Setting:
Advertisements were delivered on Facebook.
Subjects:
The target population was Australian females aged 25-60 years.
Measures:
Cost was evaluated in terms of reach per dollar. Engagement was evaluated in terms of click-through and app downloads per reach.
Analysis:
ANOVA and Chi-square were used to assess differences in reach per dollar, click-through, and app downloads per reach between time points.
Results:
Reach per dollar was highest in Post-Easter, but declined in Pre-Summer and New Year (reach/$ 34.8 vs 31.5 vs 27.5; p = .004). Click-through was highest in New Year followed by Post-Easter, then Pre-Summer (click-through 3.2% vs 1.9% vs 1.2%; p < .001). New Year and Post-Easter advertisements achieved higher app downloads per reach than Pre-Summer (downloads 0.9% vs 0.7% vs 0.3%; p < .001).
Conclusion:
Facebook advertisements were cheaper in the first time-point, and appear to be getting more expensive (i.e. declining reach/$). Advertisements in the New Year achieved the highest click-through and app downloads per reach, suggesting a useful time of year to promote physical activity products.
