Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Characterization of the Human Coronary Microvascular Response to Multiple Hyperaemic Agents
Massimo Nardone1, Mary McCarthy2, Chris I Ardern1
1School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
It is unclear whether the coronary microvascular responses to multiple, mechanistically distinct hyperaemic agents exert similar dilatory responses or share common clinical predictors. This study therefore sought to characterize the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) response to multiple hyperaemic agents in the human coronary circulation.
Methods:
Thermodilution-derived IMR was determined during intravenous adenosine, intracoronary acetylcholine, and intravenous dobutamine in patients with ischemic symptoms and nonobstructive coronary angiograms. A total of 128 patients were studied (44 with adenosine and acetylcholine, and 84 with all agents). Adenosine IMR >25, acetylcholine IMR >31, and dobutamine IMR >29 were used to define elevated responses.
Results:
IMR responses demonstrated weak-to-moderate association (adenosine vs acetylcholine IMR: ρ = 0.33; adenosine vs dobutamine IMR: ρ = 0.51; acetylcholine vs dobutamine IMR: ρ = 0.28; all P < 0.01). Logistic regression analyses revealed that: (1) elevated adenosine IMR was associated with increasing age and left ventricle hypertrophy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27 and 1.58; both P < 0.05, respectively), (2) elevated acetylcholine IMR was associated with increasing plasma uric acid (OR = 1.09; P < 0.05), and (3) elevated dobutamine IMR was associated with hypertension and left atrial volume index (OR = 3.99 and 1.07; both P < 0.05, respectively). Subset analyses to evaluate clinical utility of the acetylcholine and dobutamine IMR, independent of abnormal adenosine IMR, revealed that elevated acetylcholine and/or dobutamine IMR were associated with higher risk exercise stress tests, left atrial volumes, and burden of exertional chest pain.
Conclusions:
Microvascular-specific IMR responses to different hyperaemic agents are only moderately associated, whereas the predictors for agent-specific IMR responses varied, suggesting that multiple pharmacologic agents interrogate different microvascular control mechanisms.
More Related Videos
04:44Author Spotlight: Enhancing Vascular Function and Physical Capacity in Cardiovascular Disease Through Novel Interventions and NIRS Technology
Published on: March 22, 2024
05:58Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations