Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Association Between Preterm-Birth Phenotypes and Differential Morbidity, Growth, and Neurodevelopment at Age 2 Years:
Jose Villar1,2, María C Restrepo-Méndez1,2, Rose McGready3,4
1Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Insights
Classifying preterm birth by phenotype, not just timing, improves understanding of causes and outcomes. This approach reveals distinct clinical, growth, and neurodevelopmental differences in newborns up to age 2 years.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Developmental pediatrics
- Obstetrics
Background:
- Preterm birth etiology is complex and poorly understood, hindering effective prevention and treatment strategies.
- Current understanding often treats preterm birth as a singular event, overlooking diverse underlying causes and clinical trajectories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between specific preterm birth phenotypes and clinical, growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants up to two years of age.
- To compare these outcomes between preterm and term newborns.
Main Methods:
- The INTERBIO-21st study enrolled preterm and term singletons globally, with ultrasonography dating pregnancies.
- Infants were followed from birth to age two, with assessments including size, health, nutrition, motor development, and neurodevelopment using the INTERGROWTH-21st Neurodevelopment Assessment (INTER-NDA) tool.
- Data from 6529 infants (1381 preterm) were analyzed between November 2019 and October 2020.
Main Results:
- Eight preterm birth phenotypes were identified, with infections and preeclampsia being common. Previous preterm birth was a risk factor for recurrence.
- Each phenotype showed distinct neonatal morbidity and infant outcomes; for example, 'no main condition' phenotypes had low initial morbidity but increased later hospitalization.
- Newborns with the fetal distress phenotype exhibited the highest risk of impaired fine motor development compared to term infants.
Conclusions:
- Phenotypic classification of preterm birth offers a more nuanced understanding of its etiologic factors and mechanisms than a time-based definition alone.
- This approach can inform targeted interventions and improve developmental outcomes for diverse preterm infant populations.
Importance:
The etiologic complexities of preterm birth remain inadequately understood, which may impede the development of better preventative and treatment measures.
Objective:
To examine the association between specific preterm-birth phenotypes and clinical, growth, and neurodevelopmental differences among preterm newborns compared with term newborns up to age 2 years.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
The INTERBIO-21st study included a cohort of preterm and term newborn singletons enrolled between March 2012 and June 2018 from maternity hospitals in 6 countries worldwide who were followed up from birth to age 2 years. All pregnancies were dated by ultrasonography. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to October 2020.
Exposures/Interventions:
Preterm-birth phenotypes.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Infant size, health, nutrition, and World Health Organization motor development milestones assessed at ages 1 and 2 years; neurodevelopment evaluated at age 2 years using the INTERGROWTH-21st Neurodevelopment Assessment (INTER-NDA) tool.
Results:
A total of 6529 infants (3312 boys [50.7%]) were included in the analysis. Of those, 1381 were preterm births (mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 34.4 [0.1] weeks; 5148 were term births (mean [SD] gestational age at birth, 39.4 [0] weeks). Among 1381 preterm newborns, 8 phenotypes were identified: no main maternal, fetal, or placental condition detected (485 infants [35.1%]); infections (289 infants [20.9%]); preeclampsia (162 infants [11.7%]); fetal distress (131 infants [9.5%]); intrauterine growth restriction (110 infants [8.0%]); severe maternal disease (85 infants [6.2%]); bleeding (71 infants [5.1%]); and congenital anomaly (48 infants [3.5%]). For all phenotypes, a previous preterm birth was a risk factor for recurrence. Each phenotype displayed differences in neonatal morbidity and infant outcomes. For example, infants with the no main condition detected phenotype had low neonatal morbidity but increased morbidity and hospitalization incidence at age 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.7). Compared with term newborns, the highest risk of scoring lower than the 10th centile of INTER-NDA normative values was observed in the fine motor development domain among newborns with the fetal distress (OR, 10.6; 95% CI, 5.1-22.2) phenotype.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Results of this study suggest that phenotypic classification may provide a better understanding of the etiologic factors and mechanisms associated with preterm birth than continuing to consider it an exclusively time-based entity.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Teratogenicity
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Intellectual Disability

