Comparative contribution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in...

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value and accuracy of ictal SPECT and inter-ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in localizing the site for surgery in persons with drug resistant epilepsy.

This was a prospective observational study. Patients expected to undergo epilepsy surgery were enrolled consecutively and the localization results from different imaging modalities were discussed in an epilepsy surgery meet. Odds ratio of good outcome (Engel I) were calculated in patients who underwent surgery in concordance with MEG and SPECT findings. Post-surgical seizure freedom lasting at least 36 months or more was considered the gold standard for determining the diagnostic output of SPECT and MEG.

MEG and SPECT were performed in 101 and 57 patients respectively. In 45 patients SPECT could not be done due to delay in injection or technical factors. The accuracy of MEG and SPECT in localizing the epileptogenic zone was found to be 74.26 % and 78.57 % respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for Engel I surgical outcome was reported as 2.43 and 5.0 for MEG and SPECT respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for MEG in whom SPECT was non-informative was found to be 6.57 [95 % CI 1.1, 39.24], although it was not significantly associated with good surgical outcome. MEG was useful in indicating sites for SEEG implantation.

SPECT was found to be non-informative for most patients, but reported better diagnostic output than MEG. MEG may be a useful alternative for patients in whom SPECT cannot be done or was non-localizing.