Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

06:59
A Reverse Genetic Approach to Test Functional Redundancy During Embryogenesis
Published on: August 11, 2010
12.2K
Extensive non-redundancy in a recently duplicated developmental gene family
E A Baker1, S P R Gilbert1, S M Shimeld2
1Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
BMC Ecology and Evolution
|March 2, 2021
Summary
Newly evolved genes in the Warthog family are not always redundant, challenging evolutionary assumptions. Older gene paralogues, however, can show functional redundancy, a paradoxical finding in gene evolution studies.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Genetics
- Developmental biology
Background:
- Recent gene duplication is hypothesized to lead to functional redundancy.
- Paralogous genes are assumed to be more similar in sequence if recently duplicated.
- The nematode-specific Warthog gene family, related to Hedgehog signaling, was studied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that recently duplicated genes are more functionally redundant.
- To investigate the evolutionary origin and function of the Warthog gene family in Caenorhabditis elegans.
- To examine functional redundancy among paralogues within the Warthog family.
Main Methods:
- Molecular phylogenetics to determine evolutionary origins.
- Genetic analysis in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans.
- Construction and analysis of double and triple gene mutants.
Main Results:
- Warthog genes have acquired new roles in post-embryonic development, including left-right asymmetry and cell fate determination.
- Recently derived Warthog paralogues did not exhibit functional redundancy.
- A pair of evolutionarily divergent Warthog genes showed functional redundancy in cuticle biosynthesis.
Conclusions:
- Newer members of taxon-restricted gene families are not always functionally redundant.
- Older paralogues can exhibit functional redundancy, contradicting current gene evolution frameworks.
- Functional redundancy is not solely determined by the recency of gene duplication.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Duplication and Divergence
7.4K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
7.4K
Gene Families
9.5K
Gene families consist of groups of genes proposed to have originated from a common ancestor. Typically these arise through events in which a gene or genes are mistakenly duplicated during cell division. Unlike their parent genes (which are subject to selection pressure to maintain function), these gene copies do not need to preserve their sequences and may evolve at a relatively faster rate.
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...
9.5K
Gene Families
3.2K
3.2K
Exon Recombination
3.9K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes.
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
3.9K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
8.7K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
8.7K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
2.9K
2.9K

