Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
3.5K
Muscle-Splitting Transaxillary Revision Breast Augmentation-A Single Surgeon's Experience.
Rubem Lang Stümpfle1, Pedro Salomão Piccinini2, Eduardo Madalosso Zanin3
1Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery, Rua Gomes Jardim, Medplex - North Tower, 201 - Suite 612, Porto Alegre, RS, 90620-130, Brazil.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|March 2, 2021
Summary
Revision transaxillary breast augmentation using a muscle-splitting plane is safe and effective. This technique achieved 100% patient satisfaction with no major complications.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Aesthetic Surgery
- Breast Augmentation
Background:
- Revision breast augmentation addresses complications from primary procedures, particularly with transaxillary approaches.
- Limited literature exists on managing complications from reused axillary incisions in secondary transaxillary breast augmentation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a novel technique for revision transaxillary breast augmentation.
- To convert the approach to a muscle-splitting plane for improved breast coverage and expansion.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 41 women undergoing secondary transaxillary breast augmentation (Jan 2016-Jul 2020).
- Inclusion criteria: age ≥18, previous silicone implants, transaxillary incision; Exclusion criteria: smoking, BMI >30.
- Data collected on patient satisfaction with results and scar quality at 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- 41 patients (average age 38) included; mean BMI 21.9 kg/m².
- Indications: rippling (100%) and desire for larger implants (n=5).
- 100% patient satisfaction with overall results and scar quality; no major complications reported.
Conclusions:
- The muscle-splitting transaxillary approach is a safe and reproducible technique for revision breast augmentation.
- Demonstrates a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction.
- Offers a cost-effective alternative compared to other revision techniques.
