Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025
Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Nasal polyp eosinophilia and FeNO may predict asthma symptoms development after endoscopic sinus surgery in CRS
Ryota Kurokawa1, Yoshihiro Kanemitsu1, Kensuke Fukumitsu1
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Japan.
Background:
Asthma is a significant comorbidity of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Type2-driven biomarkers such as sinus tissue eosinophilia and fractional nitric oxide (FeNO) may be utilized to detect high risk patients who develop asthma symptoms after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in CRS patients.
Methods:
Thirty-six CRS patients without asthma who agreed to undergo ESS between October 2015 and December 2017 were prospectively observed for 12 months following ESS. They were monitored for the development of typical asthma symptoms including dyspnea, wheezes, and cough which responded to anti-asthma medication. Biomarkers were compared between patients who developed asthma symptoms after ESS (asthma symptoms group) and those who did not (non-asthma group). Biomarker changes following ESS intervention were also evaluated.
Results:
Six patients were lost to follow after ESS. Thus, 30 CRS patients [16 with nasal polyps (NPs) proved by surgery] were followed. Seven (23%) newly complained of asthma symptoms during follow-up. Levels of FeNO and the prevalence of eosinophilic NPs (eosinophils ≥ 70/high power fields) were significantly higher in the asthma symptom group than in non-asthma group [50.7 ppb vs 22.4 ppb for FeNO levels, and 100% (n = 3) vs 23% (n = 3) for eosinophilic NP prevalence, both p < 0.05]. Levels of sputum periostin decreased significantly by ESS in the non-asthma group. However, changes of biomarkers after ESS were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions:
Eosinophils in NPs (≥70/high power fields) and preoperative FeNO may be significant biomarkers for predicting the development of asthma symptoms after ESS.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
01:29Asthma-I: Introduction
01:25Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
01:30Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due...
01:30Epistaxis
Etiology
Possible causes of this condition include high blood pressure, trauma, low humidity, upper respiratory tract infections, allergies, foreign bodies, nasal inhalation of corticosteroids or illicit drugs, excessive use of decongestant nasal sprays, facial or nasal surgery, anatomic malformation, tumors, or systemic...
01:20Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.