Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Medical Therapy Versus Revascularization in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Advanced Chronic Kidney
Timir K Paul1, Mamas A Mamas2,3, Madhan Shanmugasundaram4
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, East Tennessee State University, 329 N State of Franklin Rd, Johnson City, TN, 37604, USA. pault@etsu.edu.
Insights
For stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), optimal medical therapy (OMT) shows similar outcomes to revascularization. Revascularization does not improve mortality, heart attacks, or angina relief in this high-risk group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) represent a complex comorbidity.
- Optimal medical therapy (OMT) is the cornerstone of SIHD management, but its role relative to revascularization in CKD patients is debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence comparing OMT with coronary revascularization in patients with SIHD and advanced CKD.
- To evaluate the impact of invasive versus conservative strategies on clinical outcomes and symptoms in this population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of post hoc data from the COURAGE trial for SIHD patients with CKD.
- Inclusion of data from the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, a randomized controlled trial involving 777 patients with advanced CKD.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in angina, death, or myocardial infarction (MI) between OMT and revascularization in SIHD patients with CKD (COURAGE trial).
- ISCHEMIA-CKD trial showed no difference in death or MI at 3 years, but a higher rate of death or new dialysis with revascularization.
- No sustained benefits in angina-related health status were observed with an invasive strategy compared to OMT.
Conclusions:
- An initial revascularization strategy does not reduce mortality, MI, or improve angina symptoms in patients with SIHD and advanced CKD.
- Optimal medical therapy (OMT) appears to be a safe and effective strategy for managing SIHD in patients with advanced CKD.
Purpose Of Review:
This article reviews the evidence on optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Recent Findings:
A post hoc analysis of the COURAGE trial in patients with SIHD and CKD showed no difference in freedom from angina, death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) between OMT and percutaneous intervention plus OMT compared with patients without CKD. The ISCHEMIA-CKD trial of 777 patients with advanced CKD revealed no difference in cumulative incidence of death or nonfatal MI at 3 years between OMT and revascularization but the composite of death or new dialysis was higher in the invasive arm. Additionally, there were no significant or sustained benefits in related to angina-related health status in invasive versus conservative strategy. An initial revascularization strategy does not reduce mortality or MI or relieve angina symptoms in patients with SIHD and advanced CKD.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

