Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

60
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
60

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the wider determinants of child road fatalities in England and opportunities for prevention: protocol for a mixed-methods study of the national child mortality database.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in community-dwelling people living with dementia: a cross-sectional dyadic study.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the Falls Management Exercise (FaME) programme implemented across three United Kingdom regions: a prospective cohort study.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Violence and abuse towards staff by patients and the public in general practice since COVID-19.

BJGP open·2026
Same author

Mixed-methods non-randomised single-arm feasibility study assessing delivery of a remote vocational rehabilitation intervention for patients with serious injury: the ROWTATE study.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
05:53

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

16.8K

Is proactive frailty identification a good idea? A qualitative interview study.

Ebrahim Mulla1, Elizabeth Orton1, Denise Kendrick1

  • 1Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.

The British Journal of General Practice : the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
|March 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

General practitioners (GPs) support identifying frailty in older adults but find current tools inadequate. They require better resources, education, and interventions to effectively manage frailty and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords:
frailtygeneral practitionersprimary carequalitative research

More Related Videos

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
06:58

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

184
Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
04:00

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

891

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
05:53

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty

Published on: July 24, 2013

16.8K
Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model
06:58

Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model

Published on: September 23, 2025

184
Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles
04:00

Author Spotlight: Assessing Surgical Frailty with Point-of-Care Ultrasound of Quadriceps Muscles

Published on: July 26, 2024

891

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • National contract in England mandates General Practitioners (GPs) to proactively identify and manage frailty in individuals aged 65 and above.
  • The aim is to support independent living and well-being through timely interventions for moderate to severe frailty.
  • GP perspectives on this contractual requirement are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore General Practitioners' (GPs) views on identifying frailty in older adults.
  • To understand GPs' perspectives on offering interventions for individuals with moderate or severe frailty.
  • To assess the impact of national contract requirements on primary care practice.

Main Methods:

  • A sequential mixed-methods study was conducted with GPs in the East Midlands, England.
  • Online questionnaires were distributed, followed by semi-structured telephone interviews with selected participants.
  • Data analysis involved descriptive statistics for surveys and framework analysis for interviews.

Main Results:

  • While broadly supportive of frailty identification, GPs reported that risk-stratification tools lacked necessary sensitivity and specificity.
  • Identified frailty increased workload, was under-resourced, and limited access to essential interventions.
  • GPs expressed a need for enhanced education on frailty to improve understanding and management.

Conclusions:

  • Effective proactive frailty identification and management in primary care necessitates improved GP education.
  • Development of highly sensitive and specific risk-stratification tools is crucial.
  • Enhanced access to interventions and adequate resourcing are essential for clinical impact.