Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

795
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
795
Impact of Schemas01:30

Impact of Schemas

107
Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...
107
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.6K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.6K
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

7.6K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
7.6K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

12.2K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
12.2K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.7K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2022
Same author

Social identities and the achievement gap: Incompatibility between social class background and student identity increases student disidentification, which decreases performance and leads to higher dropout rates.

The British journal of social psychology·2022
Same author

The impact of newly self-associated pictorial and letter-based stimuli in attention holding.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

When self-prioritization crosses the senses: Crossmodal self-prioritization demonstrated between vision and touch.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2020
Same author

Identity-Based Crossmodal Negative Priming: Aftereffects of Ignoring in One Sensory Modality on Responding to Another Sensory Modality.

Multisensory research·2020
Same author

Collectively biased representations of the past: Ingroup Bias in Wikipedia articles about intergroup conflicts.

The British journal of social psychology·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K

Does Self-Associating a Geometric Shape Immediately Cause Attentional Prioritization?

Gabriela Orellana-Corrales1, Christina Matschke2, Ann-Katrin Wesslein1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Eberhard-Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Experimental Psychology
|March 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Familiar self-representations capture attention, influencing cognitive tasks more than new self-associations or stranger stimuli. This effect is observed when familiar self-related information competes for attentional resources.

Keywords:
inhibition of returnself-prioritizationself-relevancespatial cuing

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.1K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.1K
Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
05:39

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Social Cognition

Background:

  • Self-related stimuli often elicit faster cognitive responses than stimuli related to others.
  • This self-advantage extends to familiar self-representations, newly learned self-associations, and combined stimuli.
  • Understanding how self-representations guide attention is crucial for cognitive theories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether familiar, new, or paired self-representations differentially guide attention compared to stranger-representations.
  • To examine the role of stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) in modulating the attentional effects of self- versus stranger-representations.
  • To determine if familiar self-representations impact attention distribution and inhibition of return (IOR).

Main Methods:

  • Three studies employed a dot-probe task with varying SOAs (100 ms and 1,000 ms).
  • Participants responded to targets following familiar and new self- versus other-associated stimuli.
  • Inhibition of return was assessed using a long SOA in later studies.

Main Results:

  • Significant performance differences were found for targets following self- versus stranger-associated stimuli.
  • These effects, including cuing effects and IOR, were contingent on the presence of familiar self-representations.
  • New self-representations alone did not significantly impact attention distribution.

Conclusions:

  • Familiar self-representations play a critical role in modulating attention during competitive scenarios.
  • New self-representations, in isolation, do not appear to influence attentional processes in the same manner.
  • The findings highlight the unique impact of established self-knowledge on attentional allocation.