Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

07:03
Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
Published on: November 6, 2016
10.8K
Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups
A Cesarani1, Y Masuda1, S Tsuruta1
1Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
Journal of Dairy Science
|March 5, 2021
Summary
Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with unknown parent groups (UPG) for both pedigree (A) and genotyped animal (A22) relationships (SS_UPG2) provides accurate and unbiased genomic breeding values. This method is robust against phenotype-pedigree data truncation, improving selection efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Genomic Selection
Background:
- Traditional BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) methods face challenges with large datasets and complex relationships.
- Genomic selection aims to improve accuracy and efficiency in animal breeding through genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV).
- Unknown parent groups (UPG) and data truncation can impact the reliability of breeding value estimations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reliability and bias of traditional BLUP, ssGBLUP with UPG for A only (SS_UPG), and ssGBLUP with UPG for both A and A22 (SS_UPG2).
- To evaluate the impact of phenotype-pedigree data truncation on GEBV accuracy and bias.
- To assess computational efficiency of different ssGBLUP models.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 6 large Holstein datasets with 80 million records and 31 million cows.
- Implemented phenotype-pedigree truncation scenarios (pre-1990, pre-2000, 2-3 ancestral generations).
- Calculated reliability and bias using deregressed proofs for bulls and predictivity for cows.
Main Results:
- SS_UPG2 achieved higher reliabilities (0.69-0.73) and unbiased predictions (regression coefficient of 1.00 ± 0.03) compared to BLUP and SS_UPG.
- SS_UPG2 showed minimal impact from data truncation on reliability and bias.
- SS_UPG2 demonstrated competitive computational efficiency (15-23 hours) compared to BLUP and SS_UPG.
Conclusions:
- ssGBLUP with UPG for both A and A22 (SS_UPG2) is the most accurate and unbiased GEBV estimation method.
- SS_UPG2 is robust to phenotype-pedigree data truncation, ensuring reliable predictions for young selection candidates.
- This advanced ssGBLUP approach enhances genomic selection accuracy in large-scale dairy cattle populations.
Related Concept Videos
Trihybrid Crosses
24.6K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
24.6K
Heritability
430
Heritability is a statistical concept that measures the degree to which genetic differences among individuals contribute to trait variations within a population. It is a fundamental idea in genetics, often prone to misinterpretation. Heritability is expressed as a percentage, reflecting the proportion of variation in a specific trait across a population that can be linked to genetic differences. However, it's important to understand that heritability does not determine how "genetic"...
430
Chi-square Analysis
41.5K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
41.5K
Monohybrid Crosses
236.0K
Overview
236.0K
Punnett Squares
121.6K
Overview
121.6K
Pedigree Analysis
87.4K
Overview
87.4K

