Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

422
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
422
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.4K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.4K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

897
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
897
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.6K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting responsible nodes in differential Bayesian networks.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

TLR4 signaling is activated in ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction in rats.

International journal of clinical and experimental pathology·2020
Same author

Silencing of LINC00461 enhances radiosensitivity of lung adenocarcinoma cells by down-regulating HOXA10 via microRNA-195.

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine·2020
Same author

ASCVD risk stratification modifies the effect of HbA1c on cardiovascular events among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with basic to moderate risk.

BMJ open diabetes research & care·2020
Same author

Erratum to "The treatment efficacy of galcanezumab for migraine: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" [Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 186 (2019) 105428].

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery·2020
Same author

Period 3, a tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer, is silenced by hypermethylation.

International journal of clinical and experimental pathology·2020
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Subgroup Analysis of Interval-censored Failure Time Data With Application to Alzheimer's Disease.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Rejoinder to Commentaries on "A Perspective on the Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies for Handling Intercurrent Events".

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Multi-Stage Drop-the-Loser Design With Superiority Boundaries.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Interpretable ROI Identification in Brain Image Analysis: Overcoming CNN Black Box Challenges With Kriging-Enhanced Adaptive Sampling.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.3K

Corrected score methods for estimating Bayesian networks with error-prone nodes.

Xianzheng Huang1, Hongmei Zhang2

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|March 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new methods for inferring cellular signaling networks from noisy flow cytometry data, improving accuracy by accounting for measurement errors in Bayesian network analysis.

Keywords:
Frobenius normfalse discovery rateinformation criterionspecificitytopological sorting

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.3K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.0K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Network inference
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • Cellular signaling networks are crucial for understanding biological processes.
  • Flow cytometry generates high-dimensional data but is prone to measurement error.
  • Accurate network inference is challenging with noisy biological data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop robust methods for inferring Bayesian networks from error-prone data.
  • To address challenges in cellular signaling network inference using flow cytometry.
  • To improve the accuracy of causal relationship identification in biological networks.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed penalized estimation methods to infer causal relationships in Bayesian networks.
  • Incorporated measurement error correction and sparsity encouragement into network estimation.
  • Developed a tuning parameter selection approach for penalized estimation.
  • Compared proposed methods against a naive approach ignoring measurement error.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated improved accuracy in network inference by accounting for measurement error.
  • Showcased the effectiveness of penalized estimation for sparse network recovery.
  • Empirical studies validated the proposed methods against a naive approach.
  • Successfully applied the methods to infer single-cell flow cytometry data.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods provide a more accurate approach to inferring cellular signaling networks.
  • Accounting for measurement error is critical for reliable network inference from flow cytometry data.
  • These techniques enhance the understanding of biological signaling pathways through robust network analysis.