Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025
Modified Octopus Technique for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Published on: August 1, 2025
Diameter change in completely remodelled proximal descending aorta after acute type I dissection repair: implications
Joon Chul Jung1, Bongyeon Sohn1, Hyoung Woo Chang1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Objectives:
Pre-dissection diameter of the proximal descending thoracic aorta (p-DTA), if available, would be the reference for determining the size of the stent graft or elephant trunk. Acute type B dissection is known to increase p-DTA diameter by 23% (Rylski factor). This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of estimating post-remodelling diameter of the p-DTA based on the Rylski factor and other post-dissection morphological parameters in acute type I dissection, based on the assumption that the post-remodelling diameter is similar to the pre-dissection diameter.
Methods:
In 60 patients with acute type I dissection showing complete remodelling of the p-DTA false lumen after surgical repair, preoperative and post-remodelling computed tomography scans were reviewed. Parameters, including maximal true lumen diameter (TLDmax) and aortic area-derived diameter divided by the Rylski factor (AoDRylski), were measured at the p-DTA.
Results:
After complete remodelling, p-DTA diameter decreased by 4.1 mm (P < 0.001). The equivalent to the Rylski factor was 15%. Both TLDmax and AoDRylski frequently showed ≥2 mm discrepancy from post-remodelling aortic diameter (36.7% and 48.3%, respectively, P = 0.30). When 2 parameters coincided within 2 mm, two-third of their estimations were accurate. AoDRylski was more accurate than TLDmax in patients with a large extent of circumferential dissection, and vice versa with less circumferential dissection (P = 0.027).
Conclusions:
Prediction of post-remodelling aortic diameter relying on a single morphologic parameter carries a substantial risk of overestimation and underestimation. Evaluation based on the extent of circumferential dissection together with the 2 parameters may provide a more reliable estimation.
