Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Frailty and Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Kenji Kanenawa1, Kyohei Yamaji1, Hiroaki Tashiro1
1Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Insights
Frailty predicts major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Higher frailty scores significantly increase bleeding risk, independent of established high bleeding risk criteria. This highlights frailty as a crucial predictor for PCI outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure, but bleeding complications remain a significant concern.
- Identifying patients at high risk for bleeding is crucial for optimizing post-PCI management.
- Frailty, a state of increased vulnerability, is increasingly recognized as a predictor of adverse outcomes in various medical conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive ability of frailty for major bleeding events following PCI.
- To determine if frailty independently predicts bleeding risk beyond established criteria.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 2439 patients undergoing PCI.
- Frailty was assessed using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging clinical frailty scale (CFS).
- Patients were categorized into low, intermediate, and high frailty groups based on CFS scores.
Main Results:
- Higher frailty scores (intermediate and high CFS groups) were significantly associated with increased 1-year major bleeding risk post-PCI.
- Patients in the intermediate CFS group had a 3.82-fold increased risk, and those in the high CFS group had a 7.81-fold increased risk.
- Frailty predicted major bleeding risk even in patients without high bleeding risk (HBR) as defined by Academic Research Consortium criteria.
Conclusions:
- Frailty is a significant independent predictor of major bleeding after PCI.
- The clinical frailty scale provides valuable prognostic information for bleeding risk assessment in PCI patients.
- Incorporating frailty assessment into routine clinical practice may improve risk stratification and patient management post-PCI.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive ability of frailty for bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In 2439 patients who underwent their PCI, frailty was prospectively assessed according to the Canadian Study of Health and Aging clinical frailty scale (CFS). Patients were divided into three groups according to the CFS: low (CFS levels 1 to 3; 1748 patients, 71.7%), intermediate (CFS levels 4 to 6; 519 patients, 21.3%), and high CFS groups (CFS levels 7 to 9; 172 patients, 7.1%). Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) was present in 47.3% in the low CFS group, in 83.2% in the intermediate CFS group and in 89.0% in the high CFS group (p <0.001). Patients in the intermediate and high CFS groups were associated with higher 1-year major bleeding risk after PCI in the overall cohort (HR 3.82, 95% CI 2.65 to 5.51, p <0.001, and HR 7.81, 95% CI 5.07 to 12.0, p <0.001, respectively). Patients in the high CFS group were also associated with higher 1-year major bleeding risk regardless of having the high bleeding risk (HBR) according to ARC-HBR. In conclusion, the association of frailty with 1-year major bleeding was consistently observed in patients with and without HBR, indicating that frailty per se might be a predictor for major bleeding after PCI on top of HBR criteria.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

