Economic Evaluation in Neurological Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
David García-Álvarez1, Núria Sempere-Rubio2,3, Raquel Faubel2,4,5
1Physiotherapist, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Universitat de València, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Brain Sciences
|March 6, 2021
Summary
This review synthesizes economic evaluations of neurological physiotherapy, finding a growing trend in cost-utility analyses, particularly for stroke and Parkinson's disease interventions. Further promotion is needed for evidence-based clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Neurological Rehabilitation
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Economic evaluations are crucial for understanding the value of healthcare interventions.
- Neurological physiotherapy offers significant potential for patient recovery and quality of life.
- A comprehensive assessment of existing economic evaluations in this field is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and assess original studies featuring economic evaluations of neurological physiotherapy interventions.
- To identify trends in the types of economic analyses and target pathologies.
- To map the geographic distribution of these studies.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases.
- Keywords included 'health economics,' 'neurological physiotherapy,' and 'cost analysis.'
- Selection of studies published within the last six years, with 43 studies included from an initial 3124 analyzed.
Main Results:
- The majority of studies focused on interventions for stroke (48.8%) and Parkinson's disease (13.9%).
- Geographic distribution showed dominance from the UK (46.5%) and USA (13.9%).
- Cost-utility analysis was the most common method (22 studies), followed by cost-effectiveness analysis (9 studies).
Conclusions:
- There is a clear upward trend in economic evaluations within neurological physiotherapy.
- Geographic and pathological focus is evident, with a need for broader representation.
- Increased promotion of these economic evaluations is recommended to support evidence-based clinical practice and decision-making.


