Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Establishing a Swine Model of Post-myocardial Infarction Heart Failure for Stem Cell Treatment
Published on: May 25, 2020
Multipoint left ventricular pacing effects on hemodynamic parameters and functional status: HUMVEE single-arm
Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou1, Polychronis Dilaveris1, Christina Chrysohoou1
1First Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokrateion General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Insights
Optimized multipoint pacing (MPP) significantly improved heart failure outcomes compared to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MPP enhanced exercise capacity, reduced heart failure symptoms, and improved echocardiographic measures, particularly in men with reduced ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) with dyssynchrony poses significant challenges.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment, but optimization is key.
- Multipoint pacing (MPP) offers an alternative pacing strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of optimized MPP versus optimized CRT in patients with dyssynchronous HF.
- To evaluate clinical, functional, and echocardiographic improvements.
Main Methods:
- A single-arm clinical trial involving 80 HF patients.
- Patients received sequential optimized CRT and optimized MPP over 6- and 12-month periods.
- Assessments included clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic parameters at baseline and after each intervention.
Main Results:
- Optimized MPP demonstrated significant additive benefits over optimized CRT.
- Improvements were observed in 6-minute walking distance, NYHA class, VTIlvot, stroke volume, LVEF, left atrial volume, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and right ventricular strain.
- Benefits were more pronounced in men and patients with lower LVEF, suggesting enhanced depolarization with MPP.
Conclusions:
- Optimized MPP is superior to optimized CRT in improving hemodynamic parameters and ventricular function in HF patients.
- MPP offers a promising alternative for patients with dyssynchronous HF, particularly those with reduced LVEF.
- The study highlights the potential of MPP to achieve more homogeneous ventricular depolarization.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of optimized multipoint pacing (MPP) over optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), in terms of clinical, functional, and echocardiographic parameters among patients with dyssynchronous heart failure (HF).
Methods:
Eighty patients (Caucasian, 77.5% male, 68.4 ± 10.1 years, and 53.8% ischemic cardiomyopathy) sequentially received optimized CRT and optimized MPP over 6- and 12-month periods in a single-arm clinical trial. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment was conducted at baseline and after the completion of each step.
Results:
Significant additive effects of optimized MPP over optimized CRT were noted with regard to 6-min walking distance (baseline/optCRT/optMPP: 293 ± 120 m vs 367 ± 94 m vs 405 ± 129 m and p < 0.001), NYHA class (2.36 vs 2.19 vs 1.45 and p < 0.001), VTIlvot (14.25 ± 3.2 cm vs 16.2 ± 4 cm vs 17.5 ± 3.4 cm and p < 0.001), stroke volume (48 ± 13.5 ml vs 55 ± 15 ml vs 59 ± 15 ml and p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (29% ± 7.1% vs 33% ± 7.3% vs 37% ± 7.7% and p < 0.001), maximal left atrial volume (77.2 ± 34.2 ml vs 74.2 ± 39.5 ml vs 67.7 ± 32 ml and p = 0.02), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (35.9 mmHg vs 33.5 mmHg vs 31 mmHg and p < 0.001), and right ventricular strain (-8.3% ± 6.9% vs -8.8% ± 6.6% vs -11.8% ± 6.1% and p = 0.022). With regard to VAC, stroke work (SW), and CP as percentages of maximal, there was a significant difference detected as compared to baseline for both CRT and MPP. Additive effects persisted only if suitable MPP dipoles were present. Exploratory analysis revealed that ischemic cardiomyopathy continued to exhibit significant differences that favor MPP, whereas nonischemic cardiomyopathy had similar findings with regard to total left atrial strain and quality of life.
Conclusions:
Optimized MPP showed significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters and ventricular function in patients with HF over optimized CRT. The beneficial effect was more prominent in men and in those with rather reduced LVEF, consistent with findings that suggest a beneficial trend in VAC and CP with more homogeneous depolarization offered by optimized MPP.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
07:41Induction and Phenotyping of Acute Right Heart Failure in a Large Animal Model of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Published on: March 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy