Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025
Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Comprehensive assessment of a clinic's experience of preimplantation genetic testing by a cumulative rate
Xinyuan Li1, Xiaoqian Zhu1, Yan Hao2
1Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract (Anhui Medical University), No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China; Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, Anhui, China.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients who had preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) or for aneuploidy screening (PGT-A) with different indications.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study at a single center. Pregnancy outcomes of all couples who had PGT from 2014 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and the cumulative pregnancy rates (CPR) and the cumulative live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate (CLB/OPR) per patient with at least one transfer cycle were calculated.
Results:
A total of 313 PGT-SR cycles of 255 patients, 22 PGT-sexing cycles of 20 patients, and 190 PGT-A cycles of 168 patients were performed during the period. In PGT-SR, the overall CPR and the CLB/OPR were 68.04% and 59.79%, respectively. In PGT-A, the CPR and CLB/OPR were 67.52% and 58.12%, respectively. We also found that the CPR (93.75%) and CLB/OPR (87.50%) were highest in patients for PGT-sexing with a diagnosis of Y chromosomal microdeletion. In addition, we discovered a significant trend that aneuploidy rate significantly increased with maternal age (p = 0.000) in PGT-A population. No significant difference was found in the mosaicism rate or clinical outcomes among the age groups. Similarly, the significance was absent in the PGT-SR population.
Conclusion:
We reviewed the CPR and CLB/OPR for different indications since the 24-chromosome technique has been applied in the clinical setting for 4 years in our center. We hope that our results will provide some pointed guidance and a new perspective on outcomes for PGT in certain patients and clinicians.
