Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic activity profiles and pattern recognition in test battery selection.

M D Waters1, H F Stack, J R Rabinowitz

  • 1Genetic Toxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

Mutation Research
|May 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of psychological disturbances on immediate memory.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Mutagenicity in lung of big Blue((R)) mice and induction of tandem-base substitutions in Salmonella by the air pollutant peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): predicted formation of intrastrand cross-links.

Mutation research·2000
Same author

Applying biomarker research.

Environmental health perspectives·2000
Same author

A review of the genetic and related effects of 1,3-butadiene in rodents and humans.

Mutation research·2000
Same author

IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety.

Mutation research·2000
Same author

The Third International Conference on Environmental Mutagens in Human Populations.

Mutation research·1999
Same journal

Monoallelic germline RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 variants in hereditary cancer testing: Variant spectrum and clinical counselling implications.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma associated biomarkers in TP53 gene; A comprehensive in silico analysis.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

IDH1 mutation promotes angiogenesis via upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha in glial tumors.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

Targeting overexpressed oncogenes in esophageal cancer through miRNA-mediated gene silencing: Insights from binding affinity and thermodynamic profiling.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

The active compound quercetin from Polygonum cuspidatum targets COL3A1 to enhance CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity in gastric cancer.

Mutation research·2026
Same journal

E2F1 promotes LIHC malignant phenotype via NEK2-mediated Wnt/β-catenin and Notch activation and EMT.

Mutation research·2026
See all related articles

Computer analysis of genetic activity profiles can optimize the selection of short-term bioassays for chemical genotoxicity testing. This pattern-recognition approach enhances accuracy over individual tests.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Computational Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Evaluating chemical genotoxicity is crucial for public health and environmental safety.
  • Traditional methods often rely on individual bioassays, which may lack comprehensive predictive power.
  • Selecting optimal test batteries is complex and resource-intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a computer-generated method for selecting optimal short-term bioassays for genotoxicity testing.
  • To enhance the accuracy and efficiency of chemical safety assessments.
  • To improve understanding of structure-activity relationships in genotoxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Developing computer-generated genetic activity profiles.
  • Utilizing pairwise matching procedures for bioassay selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performing quantitative comparative assessments of past test performance on similar chemicals.
  • Applying pattern-recognition techniques to select test batteries.

    • Main Results:

    • Computer-generated profiles and matching procedures can guide the selection of appropriate short-term bioassays.
    • This method offers greater information for test battery selection than individual qualitative test results.
    • The approach facilitates a deeper understanding of chemical properties and genotoxic responses.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-aided selection of test batteries improves genotoxicity evaluation.
    • This method enhances understanding of genotoxicity mechanisms and carcinogenesis.
    • Battery selection should integrate computational approaches with established genetic toxicity testing principles.