Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance of Dual-Layer Flat-Panel Detectors.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Two-Step Image Registration for Dual-Layer Flat-Panel Detectors.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Measurements of the noise power spectrum for digital x-ray imaging devices.

Physics in medicine and biology·2023
Same author

Conditional Covariances for the Signal Lag Measurements in Fluoroscopic Imaging.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.4K

Using deep learning for pixel-defect corrections in flat-panel radiography imaging.

Eunae Lee1, Eunyeong Hong2, Dong Sik Kim1

  • 1Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Department of Electronics Engineering, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|March 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Artificial neural networks (ANN) offer efficient pixel defect correction in radiography, matching complex models with lower computational cost. This ensures high-quality X-ray images despite TFT panel defects.

Keywords:
deep learningdefect correctiondefective pixelflat-panel detectorsradiography imaging

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.3K
Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography
11:34

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

Published on: May 15, 2017

11.4K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.3K
Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration
07:03

Medical-grade Sterilizable Target for Fluid-immersed Fetoscope Optical Distortion Calibration

Published on: February 23, 2017

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Image Processing
  • Deep Learning

Background:

  • Flat-panel radiography detectors use thin-film transistor (TFT) panels for high-quality X-ray imaging.
  • Pixel defects in TFT panels degrade image quality, reduce production yield, and increase costs.
  • Traditional defect correction algorithms are complex and difficult to optimize.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate deep learning-based algorithms for correcting pixel defects in X-ray images.
  • To compare the performance of artificial neural networks (ANN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), concatenate CNN, and generative adversarial networks (GAN) for defect correction.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated various deep learning models including ANN, CNN, concatenate CNN, and GAN.
  • Trained models using chest X-ray images with maximal defect sizes of 2x2 and 3x3 pixels.
  • Utilized mean square error (MSE) as the loss function to evaluate correction performance.

Main Results:

  • Concatenate CNN achieved the lowest MSE (68.21), indicating superior defect correction.
  • ANN demonstrated comparable performance to concatenate CNN with significantly lower encoding complexity (MSE: 69.40).
  • All deep learning methods outperformed the conventional template match correction method.

Conclusions:

  • Concatenate CNN provides the best defect-correction performance among the tested deep learning models.
  • Single-layer ANN offers an efficient alternative, balancing high correction accuracy with reduced computational complexity.
  • ANN is a viable solution for real-time defect correction in radiography systems.