Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Pathological Analysis of Lung Metastasis Following Lateral Tail-Vein Injection of Tumor Cells
Published on: May 20, 2020
Fully automated estimation of the mean linear intercept in histopathology images of mouse lung tissue
Sina Salsabili1, Marissa Lithopoulos2,3, Shreyas Sreeraman4
1Carleton University, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
Purpose: The mean linear intercept (MLI) score is a common metric for quantification of injury in lung histopathology images. The automated estimation of the MLI score is a challenging task because it requires accurate segmentation of different biological components of the lung tissue. Therefore, the most widely used approaches for MLI quantification are based on manual/semi-automated assessment of lung histopathology images, which can be expensive and time-consuming. We describe a fully automated pipeline for MLI estimation, which is capable of producing results comparable to human raters. Approach: We use a convolutional neural network based on U-Net architecture to segment the diagnostically relevant tissue segments in the whole slide images (WSI) of the mouse lung tissue. The proposed method extracts multiple field-of-view (FOV) images from the tissue segments and screen the FOV images, rejecting images based on presence of certain biological structures (i.e., blood vessels and bronchi). We used color slicing and region growing for segmentation of different biological structures in each FOV image. Results: The proposed method was tested on ten WSIs from mice and compared against the scores provided by three human raters. In segmenting the relevant tissue segments, our method obtained a mean accuracy, Dice coefficient, and Hausdorff distance of 98.34%, 98.22%, and , respectively. Our proposed method yields a mean precision, recall, and -score of 93.37%, 83.47%, and 87.87%, respectively, in screening of FOV images. There was substantial agreement found between the proposed method and the manual scores (Fleiss Kappa score of 0.76). The mean difference between the calculated MLI score between the automated method and average rater's score was ( ). Conclusion: The proposed pipeline for automated calculation of the MLI score demonstrates high consistency and accuracy with human raters and can be a potential replacement for manual/semi-automated approaches in the field.
More Related Videos
10:00Author Spotlight: Advances in Quantifying Microvascular Density in Aging Murine Lungs
Published on: January 3, 2025
11:31Using Micro-computed Tomography for the Assessment of Tumor Development and Follow-up of Response to Treatment in a Mouse Model of Lung Cancer
Published on: May 20, 2016