Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Exploring underlying drivers of genotype by environment interactions in feed efficiency traits for dairy cattle with
L Puillet1, V Ducrocq2, N C Friggens1
1Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, 75005 Paris, France.
Abstract:
Feed efficiency (FE) is a complex phenotype made up of multiple traits for which there is potential for substantial genotype by environment interaction (G × E). The objective of this study is to evaluate the extent of G × E for FE traits with a simulation approach. We used a mechanistic model of the dairy cow that simulates trajectories of phenotypes throughout lifetime, depending on trajectories of resource acquisition and allocation, driven by 4 genetic scaling parameters, and depending on the nutritional environment (quantity and quality of feed resources). The cow model, calibrated for a grass-based farming system and seasonal calving, was combined with a genetic module. This simulated genetic variation in the 4 genetic scaling parameters related to resource acquisition and allocation, based on a simple balanced pedigree structure (200 paternal half-sib groups each of 100 daughters). The population of 20,000 cows generated was simulated in 4 nutritional environment scenarios, representing a gradient of feeding constraints. In each scenario, 6 traits derived from the model outputs were analyzed to obtain population genetic parameters. Genetic correlations between second-lactation production and FE were positive and high in all scenarios and increased as the nutritional environment became more constraining. A measure of lifetime FE was positively correlated with second-lactation production under a less constrained environment, but these correlations decreased as the environment became more constraining. The genetic correlation between body reserves at second calving, and lifetime FE was positive and low in the least constraining scenario and increased as the environment became more constraining. In addition to genetic parameters, we looked at the distributions of acquisition and allocation parameters among the best performing cows for lactation and life FE, in the 2 most contrasted scenarios. The 4 subpopulations of best cows had acquisition and allocation strategies different from the whole population. In conclusion, this simulation study identifies the potential underlying biological basis for important G × E in FE traits. This highlights the importance of having a balanced breeding goal when undertaking selection that should also be based on phenotypes relevant to the target performance environment.
More Related Videos
08:29Measuring Liver Mitochondrial Oxygen Consumption and Proton Leak Kinetics to Estimate Mitochondrial Respiration in Holstein Dairy Cattle
Published on: November 30, 2018
11:02The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...
Gene-Environment Interactions
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models