Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A note on sample size computation for testing interactions.

P A Lachenbruch1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, UCLA School of Public Health 90024.

Statistics in Medicine
|April 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observations on the relationship between frequency and timing of intercourse and the probability of conception.

Population studies·2011
Same author

Frequency and timing of intercourse: Its relation to the probability of conception.

Population studies·2011
Same author

The Cutaneous Assessment Tool: development and reliability in juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)·2007
Same author

Lot consistency as an equivalence problem.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2004
Same author

Repeated measures with zeros.

Statistical methods in medical research·2002
Same author

Analysis of studies to evaluate immune response to combination vaccines.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2001
Same journal

Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study presents a straightforward method for calculating sample sizes for analysis of variance interaction tests. It simplifies power determination using orthogonal contrasts, avoiding complex non-central F distributions.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Experimental Design

Background:

  • Determining appropriate sample sizes is crucial for the statistical power of hypothesis testing in analysis of variance (ANOVA).
  • Traditional methods for calculating sample sizes for interaction effects can be complex, often requiring the use of non-central F distributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a simplified method for computing sample sizes when testing interaction effects in ANOVA.
  • To provide an accessible approach for researchers to determine adequate sample sizes without relying on the non-central F distribution.

Main Methods:

  • The proposed method utilizes orthogonal contrasts to determine statistical power for interaction effects.
  • For a 2x2 factorial design, a single degree of freedom contrast is employed.
  • For larger, more complex designs, a set of orthogonal contrasts is considered, with discussion on the application of Bonferroni or Scheffé critical values.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The method offers a computationally simple way to determine sample sizes for interaction tests.
  • It effectively bypasses the need for the non-central F distribution, making sample size calculation more accessible.
  • The approach is applicable to both simple (2x2) and complex factorial designs.

Conclusions:

  • This simplified sample size computation method enhances the practicality of designing ANOVA studies with interaction effects.
  • Researchers can more easily achieve desired statistical power by applying this technique.
  • The method promotes robust experimental design by facilitating accurate sample size determination.