Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study
Margot N I Kuylen1, Scott Y Kim2,3, Alexander Ruck Keene4,5
1Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK margot.kuylen@kcl.ac.uk.
Public views on healthcare triage during the COVID-19 pandemic reveal a preference for saving more lives over maximizing life-years. Participants favored principles of equality, efficiency, and vulnerability in resource allocation decisions.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Public Health Policy
- Sociology of Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic strained healthcare systems globally, raising concerns about resource scarcity and triage protocols.
- Triage guidelines, some incorporating age, potentially limited hospital access for elderly individuals, particularly those in care homes.
- Public engagement with moral intuitions is crucial for the legitimacy of triage guidelines affecting society.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore UK general public perspectives on the role of age and related factors (frailty, quality of life) in healthcare triage during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To understand public moral intuitions regarding ethical principles in pandemic-related resource allocation.
- To identify core values that the public deems important for guiding triage decisions.
Main Methods:
- Conducted online deliberative workshops with 22 members of the general public.
- Employed a deliberative process to elicit informed and considered public preferences on triage principles.
- Facilitated discussions on the ethical considerations of age, frailty, and quality of life in healthcare rationing.
Main Results:
- Participants accepted the necessity of triage but rejected 'fair innings' and 'life projects' as justifications for age-based allocation.
- A preference emerged for maximizing the number of lives saved over maximizing life-years.
- A consensus emerged around three core principles: equality, efficiency, and vulnerability, suggesting a balance between utilitarianism and care for vulnerable populations.
Conclusions:
- The public's ethical framework for triage prioritizes saving more lives and values equality, efficiency, and vulnerability.
- A balanced approach, tempering efficiency with concerns for equality and vulnerability, is recommended for ethical triage deliberation.
- The identified 'triad' of ethical principles offers a structure for navigating complex triage decisions in public health crises.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
The Effect of Aging on Tissues
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Excretion

