Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Effectiveness and perceptions of using templates in long-term condition reviews: a systematic synthesis of
Mary Morrissey1, Elizabeth Shepherd2, Emma Kinley3
1Health Protection Team, Public Health NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Background:
Review templates are commonly used in long-term condition (LTC) consultations to standardise care for patients and promote consistent data recording. However, templates may affect interactions during the review and, potentially, inhibit patient-centred care.
Aim:
To systematically review the literature about the impact that LTC review templates have on process and health outcomes, and the views of health professionals and patients on using review templates in consultations.
Design And Setting:
Parallel qualitative and quantitative systematic reviews.
Method:
Following Cochrane methodology, nine databases were searched (1995-2019; updated July 2020) for clinical trials and qualitative studies of LTC templates in healthcare settings. Duplicate selection, risk-of-bias assessment, and data extraction were performed. The quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted in parallel, and findings synthesised narratively.
Results:
In total, 12 qualitative and 14 quantitative studies were included (two studies reported both qualitative and quantitative data, and were included in both analyses). Review templates were well used, but the only study to assess health outcomes showed no effect. Templates can improve documentation of key measures and act as a reminder tool; however, they can restrict the review process, and risk health professionals' agendas being prioritised over those of patients. Templates may also limit opportunities to discuss individuals' concerns about living with their condition and act as a barrier to providing patient-centred care.
Conclusion:
Future research should evaluate health, as well as process, outcomes. The potential benefits of templates in improving documentation should be balanced against concerns that 'tick boxes' may override patient agendas, unless templates are designed to promote patient-centred care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:21Methods of Documentation III: PIE
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
01:26Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
01:16Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...