Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 14, 2025

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
Published on: July 22, 2025
Reviewing the use and quality of machine learning in developing clinical prediction models for cardiovascular disease
Simon Allan1, Raphael Olaiya2, Rasan Burhan3
1Manchester Medical School, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK simon.allan@student.manchester.ac.uk.
Insights
Machine learning (ML) models show promise in identifying cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk more effectively than traditional clinical prediction models (CPMs). Further research is needed before widespread ML adoption in CVD risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of mortality, encompassing conditions like heart attacks and strokes.
- Early identification of high-risk individuals for CVD enables timely intervention, often with statin therapy, improving patient outcomes.
- Current clinical prediction models (CPMs) rely on statistical analysis of risk factors like BMI and family history.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and compare existing clinical prediction models (CPMs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment.
- To analyze the emerging role and performance of machine learning (ML) approaches in predicting CVD risk.
- To evaluate the potential of ML to outperform traditional statistical CPMs in identifying individuals at high risk for CVD.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on clinical prediction models (CPMs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- Analysis of studies comparing traditional statistical CPMs with machine learning (ML) based models.
- Evaluation of the performance metrics and methodologies of both CPMs and ML approaches in CVD risk prediction.
Main Results:
- Machine learning (ML) based approaches consistently demonstrate superior performance compared to the newest non-ML clinical prediction models (CPMs).
- While current non-ML CPMs are effective, ML models offer enhanced accuracy in identifying individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- The review highlights the significant potential of ML to advance CVD risk prediction and early intervention strategies.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning (ML) models show significant potential to outperform traditional clinical prediction models (CPMs) in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment.
- Despite promising results, further research and validation are required before ML can be recommended for widespread clinical implementation over existing CPMs.
- The findings underscore the need for continued investigation into ML applications for improving early detection and management of cardiovascular disease.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of death across the world. CVD can lead to angina, heart attacks, heart failure, strokes, and eventually, death; among many other serious conditions. The early intervention with those at a higher risk of developing CVD, typically with statin treatment, leads to better health outcomes. For this reason, clinical prediction models (CPMs) have been developed to identify those at a high risk of developing CVD so that treatment can begin at an earlier stage. Currently, CPMs are built around statistical analysis of factors linked to developing CVD, such as body mass index and family history. The emerging field of machine learning (ML) in healthcare, using computer algorithms that learn from a dataset without explicit programming, has the potential to outperform the CPMs available today. ML has already shown exciting progress in the detection of skin malignancies, bone fractures and many other medical conditions. In this review, we will analyse and explain the CPMs currently in use with comparisons to their developing ML counterparts. We have found that although the newest non-ML CPMs are effective, ML-based approaches consistently outperform them. However, improvements to the literature need to be made before ML should be implemented over current CPMs.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:51Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...